West Virginia Code § 18A-3C-2

Performance evaluations of professional personnel
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(a) The provisions of this section govern the performance evaluation of classroom teachers,
principals and assistant principals employed in public schools and school systems. To the
extent that this section conflicts with the provisions of §18A-2-12 of this code relating to
professional personnel performance evaluations, this section shall govern.
(b) Before July 1, 2018, the state board shall adopt a legislative rule in accordance with
§29A-3B-1 et seq. of this code, for annually evaluating the performance of each professional
person. The rule shall provide for performance evaluations of professional personnel to be
conducted in accordance with this section in each school and schuool system.
(c)(1) The process adopted by the state board for evaluating the performance of classroom
teachers shall incorporate at least the following:
(A) Alignment with the West Virginia Professional Teaching Standards adopted by the state
board that establish the foundation for educator prleparation, teacher assessment, and
professional development throughout the statse;
(B) Employment of the professional teachinig standards to provide explicit and extensive
measures of the work of teaching and what teachers must know and be able to do and
provide evaluative measures of educator performance; and
(C) The use of two pieces of evidence at two points in time over the instructional term to
demonstrate student learning as an indicator of educator performance.
(2) Eighty percent of the evaluation shall be based on an appraisal of the educator's ability to
perform the critical s tandard elements of the professional teaching standards. The appraisal
shall include cVonferences with the evaluator reinforced through observation. Twenty percent
of the evaluation shall be based on evidence of the learning of the students assigned to the
educator in accordance with paragraph (C), subdivision (1) of this subsection.
(d)(1) The process adopted by the state board for evaluating the performance of principals
and assistant principals shall include at least the following:
(A) Alignment with the West Virginia Professional Leadership Standards adopted by the
state board establishing the responsibility of principals for the collective success of their
school including the learning, growth, and achievement of students, staff, and self;
(B) Employment of the professional leadership standards to provide explicit and extensive
measures of the work of school leadership focused on the continuous improvement of
teaching and learning. The process shall include conferences and goal setting with the
superintendent or his or her designee and the use of a survey of stakeholders to assist in
identifying the needs and establishing the goals for the school and the principal. The survey
shall be distributed to at least the following stakeholders: Students, parents, teachers, and
service personnel. The evaluative measures shall include the use of data, evidence, and
artifacts to confirm the principal's performance on achieving the goals established by the
principal and superintendent; and
(C) The use of two pieces of evidence at two points in time over the instructional term to
demonstrate the growth in student learning at the school.
(2) Eighty percent of the evaluation shall be based on an appraisal of the principal's or the
assistant principal's ability to perform the critical standard elements of the professional
leadership standards and achieve the goals established for the principal and the school.
Twenty percent of the evaluation shall be based on evidence of the learning of the students
assigned to the school in accordance with paragraph (C), subdivuision (1) of this subsection.
(e) Evaluations of the performance of professional personnel shall serve the following
purposes:
(1) Serve as a basis for the improvement of the performance of the professional personnel in
their assigned duties; l
(2) Serve as the basis for providing professional development specifically targeted on the
area or areas identified through the evaluaition process as needing improvement. If possible,
this targeted professional development should be delivered at the school site using
collaborative processes, mentoring or coaching or other approaches that maximize use of
the instructional setting;
(3) Serve as the basis for establishing priorities for the provision of county-level professional
development when aggregate evaluation data from the county's schools indicates an area or
areas of needed improvement;
(4) Serve as aV basis for informing the teacher preparation programs in this state of an area
or areas of needed improvement in the programs, or informing a specific program of needed
improvement, when state-level aggregate evaluation data indicates that beginning teachers
who have graduated from the program have specific weaknesses;
(5) Provide an indicator of level of performance of the professional personnel and, if the
evaluation indicates any area, quality, skill, or level of performance is less than
accomplished, provide an explanation and data to support the evaluation;
(6) Serve as a basis for programs to increase the professional growth and development of
professional personnel; and
(7) Serve as documentation for a dismissal on the grounds of unsatisfactory performance.
(f) The rule adopted by the state board shall include standards for the performance of
professional personnel and the criteria to be used to determine whether their performance
meets the standards. The rule also shall include guidance on best practices for providing
time within the school day for teachers and leaders subject to performance evaluations
under this section to participate in the collaborative mentoring or coaching and planning
processes necessary for execution of the performance evaluation process and achieving
advanced levels of performance.
(g) The rule adopted by the state board shall include provisions for written improvement
plans when necessary to improve the performance of the professional personnel. The written
improvement plan shall be specific as to what improvements are needed in tehe performance
of the professional personnel and shall clearly set forth recommendations for improvements
including recommendations for additional education and training of prorfessionals subject to
recertification. Professional personnel whose performance evaluation includes a written
improvement plan shall be given an opportunity to improve his or her performance through
the implementation of the plan.
(h) A professional person whose performance is considered to be unsatisfactory shall be
given written notice of his or her deficiencies. A written improvement plan to correct these
deficiencies shall be developed by the employing county board and the employee. The
professional person shall be given a reasonable period of time, not exceeding 12 months, to
accomplish the requirements of the improvemsent plan and shall receive a written statement
of the resources and assistance available for the purposes of correcting the deficiencies. If
the next performance evaluation shows that the professional is now performing
satisfactorily, no further action mayg be taken concerning the original performance
evaluation. If the evaluation shows that the professional is still not performing satisfactorily,
the evaluator either shall makee additional written recommendations for improvement or may
recommend the dismissal of the professional personnel in accordance with the provisions of
§18A-2-8 of this code. L
(i) No person may evaluate professional personnel for the purposes of this section unless the
person has an administrative certificate issued by the state superintendent and has
successfully completed education and training in evaluation skills approved by the state
board which will enable the person to make fair, professional, and credible evaluations of the
perWsonnel whom the person is responsible for evaluating.
(j) Prior to implementation of the evaluation process pursuant to this section at a school,
each affected employee shall be given training to ensure that the employees have a full
understanding of the purposes, instruments, and procedures used in evaluating their
performance. Thereafter, this training shall be held annually at the beginning of the
employment term.

‹ Prev All West Virginia sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.