Utah Code § 53E-3-526

Student data systems and reporting study
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(1) As used in this section:
(a) "Advisory committee" means the Data Systems and Reporting Advisory Committee created in
Subsection (3).
(b) "Data retention schedule" means a schedule for maintaining and disposing of student data in
accordance with Section 63G-2-604.
(c) "Legacy system" means a student information system that:
(i) was implemented before May 1, 2025; and
(ii) may require manual data transmission to the state board in varying formats.
(d) "Manual data transmission" means a process that requires LEA staff to:
(i) extract data from a student information system;
(ii) modify the data format; or
(iii) manually enter data into a separate system.
(e) "Reporting requirement" means any obligation that requires an LEA to submit data or
information to the state board or another governmental entity established in:

(i) statute;
(ii) state board rule; or
(iii) state board policy.
(f) "Student information system" means a computer database that:
(i) provides the functions described in Section 53E-3-518; and
(ii) maintains student records and data over time.
(g) "Student personally identifiable information" means student data that:
(i) identifies a student; or
(ii) is used by the holder to identify a student as defined in Section 53E-9-301.
(h) "System modification" means a change to a student information system required or caused
by:
(i) statutory amendments;
(ii) administrative rule changes; or
(iii) state board policy updates.
(2) The state board shall:
(a) conduct a comprehensive study of LEA data practices, systems, and reporting;
(b) coordinate with the advisory committee throughout the study process;
(c) seek input from relevant stakeholders, including:
(i) school district superintendents;
(ii) charter school administrators;
(iii) LEA technology directors;
(iv) LEA student data managers;
(v) the Utah School Boards Association;
(vi) the Utah Association of Public Charter Schools;
(vii) student information system vendors; and
(viii) other parties the state board determines necessary; and
(d) establish working groups as needed to examine specific study components.
(3) The state board shall create a Data Systems and Reporting Advisory Committee that:
(a) includes representatives from:
(i) urban school districts;
(ii) rural school districts;
(iii) charter schools;
(iv) the state board;
(v) the Department of Administrative Services with expertise in regulations related to
government records; and
(vi) other stakeholders as determined by the state board;
(b) provides guidance on study scope and methodology;
(c) reviews preliminary findings and recommendations;
(d) meets at least quarterly during the study period; and
(e) assists in preparing the final report.
(4) The advisory committee shall ensure the study of student data retention examines:
(a) types of student personally identifiable information collected by LEAs, including:
(i) information required by federal law;
(ii) information required by state law;
(iii) information required by administrative rule;
(iv) optional information collected by an LEA; and
(v) retention requirements for each type;
(b) methods used by LEAs to:

(i) store student personally identifiable information;
(ii) secure stored data;
(iii) control access to data;
(iv) maintain data quality;
(v) track data retention schedules; and
(vi) dispose of outdated data;
(c) compliance with:
(i) retention schedules under Section 63G-2-604;
(ii) privacy requirements under Chapter 9, Student Privacy and Data Protection;
(iii) security standards established by the state board; and
(iv) federal privacy laws;
(d) potential requirements for:
(i) annual data audits;
(ii) regular purging of non-essential data;
(iii) standardized retention schedules; and
(iv) data disposal verification; and
(e) fiscal and operational impacts of recommended changes.
(5) The advisory committee shall ensure the study of student information systems examines:
(a) current LEA expenditures for:
(i) system licensing;
(ii) hosting services;
(iii) technical support;
(iv) staff training;
(v) data extraction;
(vi) custom programming; and
(vii) system modifications;
(b) staff time required for:
(i) manual data transmission;
(ii) data validation;
(iii) error correction;
(iv) report generation; and
(v) system maintenance;
(c) frequency and cost of system modifications required by:
(i) legislative changes;
(ii) rule updates; and
(iii) new data requests;
(d) capabilities and limitations of:
(i) current LEA systems;
(ii) the state board system under Section 53E-3-518; and
(iii) potential alternative solutions;
(e) examples of statewide student information systems in other states;
(f) analysis of:
(i) total statewide spending on individual LEA systems;
(ii) projected costs of a single statewide system;
(iii) potential savings from consolidation;
(iv) implementation challenges; and
(v) transition requirements; and
(g) recommendations for improving system efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

(6) The advisory committee shall ensure the study of reporting requirements examines:
(a) existing reporting obligations, including:
(i) statutory reports;
(ii) administrative rule reports;
(iii) grant-required reports;
(iv) federal reports; and
(v) other regular data submissions;
(b) for each identified requirement:
(i) legal basis;
(ii) intended purpose;
(iii) current uses;
(iv) submission frequency;
(v) required data elements;
(vi) collection burden; and
(vii) continued relevance;
(c) potential criteria for:
(i) evaluating reporting necessity;
(ii) consolidating similar reports;
(iii) eliminating obsolete requirements; and
(iv) sunsetting provisions;
(d) methods to:
(i) track reporting obligations;
(ii) evaluate requirement impacts;
(iii) coordinate review processes; and
(iv) implement sunset procedures;
(e) processes for:
(i) annual reporting review;
(ii) sunset recommendations;
(iii) requirement reauthorization; and
(iv) stakeholder input; and
(f) proposed structures for:
(i) managing reporting requirements;
(ii) implementing sunset provisions; and
(iii) maintaining transparency.
(7) On or before September 15, 2025, the state board shall:
(a) prepare a report that includes:
(i) study findings related to student information systems as described in Subsection (5);
(ii) stakeholder input related to student information systems;
(iii) fiscal impacts;
(iv) implementation considerations; and
(v) specific recommendations for:
(A) student information system improvements;
(B) statutory changes related to student information systems;
(C) rule modifications related to student information systems; and
(D) implementation timelines; and
(b) present the report to the Education Interim Committee.
(8) On or before September 15, 2026, the state board shall:
(a) prepare a report that includes:

(i) study findings related to:
(A) student data retention as described in Subsection (4); and
(B) reporting requirements as described in Subsection (6);
(ii) stakeholder input related to these components;
(iii) fiscal impacts;
(iv) implementation considerations; and
(v) specific recommendations for:
(A) data retention policies;
(B) reporting requirement management;
(C) statutory changes related to these components;
(D) rule modifications related to these components; and
(E) implementation timelines; and
(b) present the report to the Education Interim Committee.
(9) The Education Interim Committee shall:
(a) review the state board reports described in Subsections (7) and (8);
(b) accept public testimony on the recommendations;
(c) evaluate implementation requirements; and
(d) consider whether to recommend legislation for:
(i) the 2026 General Session based on the report described in Subsection (7); and
(ii) the 2027 General Session based on the report described in Subsection (8).

‹ Prev All Utah sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.