Tennessee Code § 34-1-127

Least restrictive alternative to be imposed
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
The court has an affirmative duty to ascertain and impose the least restrictive alternatives upon the person with a disability that are consistent with adequate protection of the person with a disability and the property of the person with a disability. Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 435,s 42, eff. 7/1/2013. Acts 1992, ch. 794, § 28; T.C.A. § 34-11-127.
The court has an affirmative duty to ascertain and impose the least restrictive alternatives upon the person with a disability that are consistent with adequate protection of the person with a disability and the property of the person with a disability. Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 435,s 42, eff. 7/1/2013. Acts 1992, ch. 794, § 28; T.C.A. § 34-11-127.
The court has an affirmative duty to ascertain and impose the least restrictive alternatives upon the person with a disability that are consistent with adequate protection of the person with a disability and the property of the person with a disability. Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 435,s 42, eff. 7/1/2013. Acts 1992, ch. 794, § 28; T.C.A. § 34-11-127.
The court has an affirmative duty to ascertain and impose the least restrictive alternatives upon the person with a disability that are consistent with adequate protection of the person with a disability and the property of the person with a disability.
Acts 1992, ch. 794, § 28; T.C.A. § 34-11-127.

‹ Prev All Tennessee sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.