Oklahoma Code § 63-1-1709.1

Title 63. Public Health And Safety: Peer review information
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
A.  As used in this section:
1.  "Credentialing or recredentialing data" means:

a. the application submitted by a health care
professional requesting appointment or reappointment
to the medical staff of a health care entity or
requesting clinical privileges or other permission to
provide health care services at a health care entity,
b. any information submitted by the health care
professional in support of such application,
c. any information, unless otherwise privileged, obtained
by the health care entity during the credentialing or
recredentialing process regarding such application,
and
d. the decision made by the health care entity regarding
such application;
2.  "Credentialing or recredentialing process" means any
process, program or proceeding utilized by a health care entity to
assess, review, study or evaluate the credentials of a health care
professional;
3.  "Health care entity" means:
a. any hospital or related institution offering or
providing health care services under a license issued
pursuant to Section 1-706 of this title,
b. any ambulatory surgical center offering or providing
health care services under a license issued pursuant
to Section 2660 of this title,
c. the clinical practices of accredited allopathic and
osteopathic state medical schools, and
d. any other entity directly involved in the delivery of
health care services that engages in a credentialing
or peer review process;
4.  "Health care professional" means any person authorized to
practice allopathic medicine and surgery, osteopathic medicine,
podiatric medicine, optometry, chiropractic, psychology, dentistry,
or a dental specialty, a physician assistant, or an advanced
practice registered nurse under a license issued pursuant to Title
59 of the Oklahoma Statutes;
5.  "Peer review information" means all records, documents and
other information generated during the course of a peer review
process, including any reports, statements, memoranda,
correspondence, record of proceedings, materials, opinions,
findings, conclusions and recommendations, credentialing data and
recredentialing data, but does not include:
a. the medical records of a patient whose health care in
a health care entity is being reviewed,
b. incident reports and other like documents regarding
health care services being reviewed, regardless of how
the reports or documents are titled or captioned,

c. the identity of any individuals who have personal
knowledge regarding the facts and circumstances
surrounding the patient's health care in the health
care entity,
d. factual statements regarding the patient's health care
in the health care entity from any individuals who
have personal knowledge regarding the facts and
circumstances surrounding the patient's health care,
which factual statements were generated outside the
peer review process,
e. the identity of all documents and raw data previously
created elsewhere and considered during the peer
review process, or
f. copies of all documents and raw data previously
created elsewhere and considered during the peer
review process, whether available elsewhere or not;
and
6.  "Peer review process" means any process, program or
proceeding, including a credentialing or recredentialing process,
utilized by a health care entity or county medical society to
assess, review, study or evaluate the credentials, competence,
professional conduct or health care services of a health care
professional.
B.  1.  Peer review information shall be private, confidential
and privileged except that a health care entity or county medical
society shall be permitted to provide relevant peer review
information to the state agency or board which licensed the health
care professional who provided the health care services being
reviewed in a peer review process or who is the subject of a
credentialing or recredentialing process, with notice to the health
care professional.
2.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to abrogate,
alter or affect any provision in the Oklahoma Statutes which
provides that information regarding liability insurance of a health
care entity or health care professional is not discoverable or
admissible.
C.  In any civil action in which a patient or patient's legal
representative has alleged that the patient has suffered injuries
resulting from negligence by a health care professional in providing
health care services to the patient in a health care entity, factual
statements, presented during a peer review process utilized by such
health care entity, regarding the patient's health care in the
health care entity from individuals who have personal knowledge of
the facts and circumstances surrounding the patient's health care
shall not be subject to discovery.
D.  1.  In any civil action in which a patient or patient's
legal representative has alleged that the health care entity was

independently negligent as a result of permitting the health care
professional to provide health care services to the patient in the
health care entity, the credentialing and recredentialing data, and
the recommendations made and action taken as a result of any peer
review process utilized by such health care entity regarding the
health care professional prior to the date of the alleged negligence
shall be subject to discovery pursuant to the Oklahoma Discovery
Code.
2.  Any information discovered pursuant to this subsection:
a. shall not be admissible as evidence until a judge or
jury has first found the health care professional to
have been negligent in providing health care services
to the patient in such health care entity, and
b. shall not at any time include the identity or means by
which to ascertain the identity of any other patient
or health care professional.
E.  No person involved in a peer review process may be permitted
or required to testify regarding the peer review process in any
civil proceeding or disclose by responses to written discovery
requests any peer review information.
Added by Laws 1999, c. 180, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1999.  Amended by Laws
2000, c. 354, § 1, emerg. eff. June 6, 2000; Laws 2002, c. 156, § 3,
eff. Nov. 1, 2002; Laws 2004, c. 558, § 2, emerg. eff. June 9, 2004;
Laws 2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 5, § 2, emerg. eff. Sept. 10, 2013; Laws
2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 5, § 3, emerg. eff. Sept. 10, 2013; Laws
2014, c. 294, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2014; Laws 2024, c. 200, § 1, eff.
Nov. 1, 2024.
NOTE:  Laws 2009, c. 228, § 28 was held unconstitutional by the
Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of Douglas v. Cox Retirement
Properties, Inc., 2013 OK 37, 302 P.2d 789 (Okla. 2013) and repealed
by Laws 2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 5, § 1, emerg. eff. Sept. 10, 2013.

‹ Prev All Oklahoma sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.