Nevada Code § 412.422

Reporting of findings and sentence to convening authority; submission of matters for consideration by accused; modification of findings and sentence by convening authority; action on sentence; proceeding in revision or rehearing; initial review by convening authority; review of record and opinion by State Judge Advocate
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
1. The findings and sentence of a
court-martial must be reported promptly to the convening authority after the
announcement of the sentence.
2. The accused may submit to the convening
authority matters for consideration by the convening authority with respect to
the findings and the sentence. Any such submission must be in writing. Except
in a summary court-martial case, such a submission must be made within 10 days
after the accused has been given an authenticated record of trial under
subsection 4 and, if applicable, the recommendation of a judge advocate. In a
summary court-martial case, such a submission must be made within 7 days after
the sentence is announced.
3. If the accused shows that additional
time is required for the accused to submit such matters, the convening
authority or other person taking action under this section, for good cause, may
extend the applicable period under subsection 2 for not more than an additional
20 days.
4. In a summary court-martial case, the
accused must be promptly provided a copy of the record of trial for use in
preparing a submission authorized by subsection 2.
5. The accused may waive the right to make
a submission to the convening authority under subsection 2. Such a waiver must
be made in writing and may not be revoked. For the purposes of subsection 7,
the time within which the accused may make a submission pursuant to this
subsection shall be deemed to have expired upon the submission of such a waiver
to the convening authority.
6. The convening authority has sole
discretion to modify the findings and sentence of a court-martial pursuant to
this section. If it is impractical for the convening authority to act, the
convening authority shall forward the case to a person exercising general
court-martial jurisdiction who may take action under this section.
7. Action on the sentence of a
court-martial must be taken by the convening authority or by another person
authorized to act under this section. The convening authority or other person
authorized to take such action may do so only after consideration of any
matters submitted by the accused pursuant to subsection 2 or after the time for
submitting such matters expires, whichever is earlier. The convening authority
or other person taking such action may approve, disapprove, commute or suspend
the sentence in whole or in part.
8. The convening authority or other person
authorized to act on the sentence of a court-martial may, in the persons sole
discretion:
(a) Dismiss any charge or specifications by
setting aside a finding of guilty;
(b) Change a finding of guilty on a charge or
specification to a finding of guilty on an offense that is a lesser included
offense of the offense stated in the charge or specification; or
(c) Refrain from taking any such action.
9. Before acting under this section on any
general or special court-martial case in which there is a finding of guilt, the
convening authority or other person taking action under this section shall
obtain and consider the written recommendation of a judge advocate. The
convening authority or other person taking action under this section shall
refer the record of trial to the judge advocate, and the judge advocate shall
use such record in the preparation of the recommendation. The recommendation of
the judge advocate must include such matters as may be prescribed by regulation
and must be served on the accused, who may submit any matter in response
pursuant to subsection 2. By failing to object in the response to the
recommendation or to any matter attached to the recommendation, the accused
waives the right to object thereto.
10. The convening authority or other
person taking action under this section, in the persons sole discretion, may
order a proceeding in revision or a rehearing if there is an apparent error or
omission in the record or if the record shows improper or inconsistent action
by a court-martial with respect to findings or sentence that can be rectified
without material prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused. In no
case, however, may a proceeding in revision:
(a) Reconsider a finding of not guilty of any
specification or a ruling which amounts to a finding of not guilty;
(b) Reconsider a finding of not guilty of any
charge, unless there has been a finding of guilty under a specification laid
under that charge, which sufficiently alleges a violation of some article of
this Code; or
(c) Increase the severity of the sentence unless
the sentence prescribed for the offense is mandatory.
11. The convening authority or other person
taking action under this section may order a rehearing if that person
disapproves the findings and sentences and states the reasons for disapproval
of the findings. If such person disapproves the findings and sentence and does
not order a rehearing, that person shall dismiss the charges. The convening
authority or other person taking action under this subsection may not order a
rehearing as to the findings where there is a lack of sufficient evidence in
the record to support the findings. The convening authority or other person
taking action under this subsection may order a rehearing as to the sentence if
that person disapproves the sentence.
12. After a trial by court-martial the
record shall be forwarded to the convening authority, as reviewing authority,
and action thereon may be taken by the person who convened the court, a
commissioned officer commanding for the time being, a successor in command or
by the Governor.
13. The convening authority shall refer
the record of each general court-martial to the State Judge Advocate, who shall
submit his or her written opinion thereon to the convening authority. If the
final action of the court has resulted in an acquittal of all charges and
specifications, the opinion must be limited to questions of jurisdiction.

‹ Prev All Nevada sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.