Nevada Code § 1.4665

Procedures for allegation of incapacity; informal resolution of complaint relating to incapacity; medical, psychiatric or psychological testing by physician; burden of proof
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
1. Except as otherwise provided in this
section or in the procedural rules adopted by the Commission, the Commission
shall use the same procedures with respect to allegations of incapacity as it
uses with respect to allegations of misconduct.
2. The Commission shall attempt to resolve
the following matters informally:
(a) A complaint received by the Commission which
alleges that a judge is incapacitated;
(b) A matter in which the preliminary
investigation reveals that a judge may have a physical or mental disability;
and
(c) A matter in which the judge raises a mental
or physical disability as an issue before the filing of the formal statement of
charges.
3. An informal resolution by the
Commission pursuant to subsection 2 includes, without limitation:
(a) Voluntary retirement by the judge; and
(b) If the disability can be adequately addressed
through treatment, a deferred discipline agreement pursuant to NRS 1.468 .
4. In attempting to resolve a matter
informally, the Commission may request that the judge named in the complaint
submit to medical, psychiatric or psychological testing by a physician licensed
to practice medicine in this State who is selected by the Commission.
5. If the Commission is unable to resolve
the matter informally pursuant to subsection 2, the Commission shall:
(a) Proceed as set forth in NRS 1.4667 , 1.467 and 1.4673 .
(b) Unless the judge has retained counsel at his
or her own expense, appoint an attorney to represent the judge at public
expense.
6. If a judge raises a mental or physical
disability as an affirmative defense or in mitigation, the judge shall be
deemed to have consented to medical, psychiatric or psychological testing and
to have waived the psychologist-patient privilege, doctor-patient privilege,
marriage and family therapist-client privilege and social worker-client
privilege set forth in chapter 49 of NRS, as
applicable. The Commission shall require the judge to produce relevant medical
records and to submit to medical, psychiatric or psychological testing by a
physician licensed to practice medicine in this State who is selected by the
judge. If the judge refuses to produce medical records or submit to an
examination, the Commission shall preclude the judge from presenting the medical
records or evidence of the results of medical examinations conducted on behalf
of the judge and may consider the refusal as evidence that the judge has an
incapacity that seriously interferes with the performance of judicial duties of
the judge and is likely to become permanent, or as evidence contradicting the
claim of a disability by the judge as an affirmative defense or mitigating
factor.
7. If a judge raises a mental illness or
other disability as a defense or mitigating factor in a proceeding alleging
misconduct, the judge has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the
evidence that:
(a) He or she has a serious mental illness or
other disability;
(b) The mental illness or other disability caused
the misconduct;
(c) He or she has undergone or is undergoing
treatment for the mental illness or other disability;
(d) The treatment has abated the cause of the
misconduct; and
(e) The misconduct is not likely to recur.
8. The findings of a physician selected by
the Commission pursuant to this section are not privileged communications.
9. The provisions of this section do not
prohibit a judge from having legal counsel and a physician of his or her choice
present at a medical, psychiatric or psychological examination conducted
pursuant to this section.
10. The Commission shall adopt procedural
rules to carry out the provisions of this section.

‹ Prev All Nevada sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.