Colorado Code § 40-4-106

Rules for public safety - crossings - civil fines - allocation of expenses
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(1)
(a) The commission may, after a hearing on its own motion or upon complaint, make general or
special orders, promulgate rules, or act by other means to require each public utility to maintain
and operate its lines, plant, system, equipment, electrical wires, apparatus, tracks, and premises
in such a manner as to promote and safeguard the health and safety of its employees, passengers,
customers, subscribers, and the public and to require the performance of any other act that the
health or safety of its employees, passengers, customers, subscribers, or the public may demand.
(b) If, pursuant to this subsection (1), the commission issues an order or promulgates a
rule requiring a railroad company to comply with railroad crossing safety regulations, the
commission may impose a civil penalty pursuant to article 7 of this title 40, in an amount not to
exceed the maximum amount set forth in section 40-7-105 (1), against a railroad company that
fails to comply with the order or rule.
(2) (a) The commission has the power to determine, order, and prescribe, in accordance
with the plans and specifications to be approved by it, the just and reasonable manner including
the particular point of crossing at which the tracks or other facilities of any public utility may be
constructed across the facilities of any other public utility at grade, or above or below grade, or
at the same or different levels, or at which the tracks or other facilities of any railroad
corporation may be constructed across any public highway at grade, or above or below grade, or
at which any public highway may be constructed across the tracks or other facilities of any
railroad corporation at grade, or above or below grade and to determine, order, and prescribe the
terms and conditions of installation and operation, maintenance, and warning at all such
crossings that may be constructed, including the posting of personnel or the installation and
regulation of lights, block, interlocking, or other system of signaling, safety appliance devices, or
such other means or instrumentalities as may to the commission appear reasonable and necessary
to the end, intent, and purpose that accidents may be prevented and the safety of the public
promoted.
(b) Whenever the commission orders in any proceeding before it, regardless of by whom
or how such proceeding was commenced, that automatic or other safety appliance signals or
devices be installed, reconstructed, or improved and operated at any crossing at grade of any
public highway or road over the tracks of any railroad corporation, the commission shall also
determine and order, after notice and hearing, how the cost of installing, reconstructing, or
improving such signals or devices shall be divided between and paid by the interested railroad
corporation whose tracks are located at the crossing on the one hand and the chief engineer and
the interested city, city and county, town, county, or other political subdivision of the state on the
other hand. In determining how much of the cost shall be paid by the railroad corporation,
consideration shall be given to the benefit, if any, that will accrue from the signals or devices to
the railroad corporation, but in every case the part to be paid by the railroad corporation shall be
not less than twenty percent of the total cost of the signals or devices at any crossing, and the
orders shall provide that every signal or device installed will be maintained by the railroad
corporation for the life of the crossing to be so signalized. In order to compensate for the use of
the crossings by the public generally, the commission shall also order that such part of the cost
of installing, reconstructing, or improving the signals or devices as will not be paid by the
railroad corporation be divided between the highway-rail crossing signalization fund and the
city, town, city and county, county, or other political subdivision in which the crossing is
located, and the commission shall fix in each case the amount to be paid from the highway-rail
crossing signalization fund and the amount to be paid by the city, town, city and county, county,
or other political subdivision. Any order of the commission under this section for the payment of
any part of any such costs from the highway-rail crossing signalization fund is authority for the
state treasurer to pay out of said fund to the person, firm, or corporation entitled thereto under
the commission's order the amount so determined to be paid from said fund. The requirement of
notice and hearing in this section is deemed to have been complied with by the commission's
giving notice of and holding a hearing upon the question of whether any such signals or devices
are required at any crossing; but in such cases the notice shall state that the question of how the
costs will be borne and paid will be considered at and determined as a result of the hearing for
which the notice is given. This paragraph (b) shall not apply to any grade crossing when all or
any part of the cost of the installation, reconstruction, or improvement of the signals or devices
at the crossing will be paid from funds available under any federal or federal-aid highway act.
(3) (a) (I) The commission also has power upon its own motion or upon complaint and
after hearing, of which all the parties in interest including the owners of adjacent property shall
have due notice, to order any crossing constructed at grade or at the same or different levels to be
relocated, altered, or abolished, according to plans and specifications to be approved and upon
just and reasonable terms and conditions to be prescribed by the commission, and to prescribe
the terms upon which the separation should be made and the proportion in which the expense of
the alteration or abolition of the crossing or the separation of the grade should be divided
between the railroad corporations affected or between the corporation and the state, county,
municipality, or public authority in interest.
(II) Notwithstanding the provisions of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (a), the
affected railroad corporation, the commission, the department of transportation, or the local
government responsible for supervising and maintaining the intersecting public highway or road
may abolish any crossing at grade of any public highway or road over the tracks of a corporation
if:
(A) The crossing is without gates, signals, alarm bells, or warning personnel and is
located within one-quarter mile of a crossing with gates, signals, alarm bells, or warning
personnel or a separated grade crossing;
(B) The crossing is not the only crossing that provides access to property;
(C) No less than sixty days prior to the proposed abolition date, the railroad corporation,
commission, department of transportation, or local government posts conspicuous notice of the
proposed abolition at the crossing and gives written notice of the proposed abolition to all other
entities authorized to initiate abolition of the crossing pursuant to this subparagraph (II); and
(D) Neither any entity given notice nor any other interested party files an objection to
the abolition pursuant to subparagraph (III) of this paragraph (a).
(III) A crossing shall not be abolished pursuant to subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (a)
if an entity given notice pursuant to sub-subparagraph (C) of subparagraph (II) of this paragraph
(a) or any other interested party, within sixty days of receiving such notice, files with the
commission and provides to the entity that gave notice of the proposed abolition a written
objection to the abolition. The written objection shall include a statement by a professional
engineer licensed to practice in Colorado that indicates that the engineer is familiar with the
requirements of subparagraph (II) of this paragraph (a) and all relevant aspects of the crossing
and has examined the crossing and believes that it is safe as designed. However, nothing in this
subparagraph (III) shall preclude the abolition of the crossing pursuant to subparagraph (I) of
this paragraph (a).
(b) (I) (A) The commission is authorized to approve individual projects wherein the
allocation of the total expenses of the separation of grades to be paid by the railroad corporation
or railroad corporations may exceed two million five hundred thousand dollars. The commission
may approve more than one project, the sum totals of which may exceed the two-million-five-
hundred-thousand-dollar cap set forth in this subparagraph (I), but in no event shall an individual
class I railroad corporation pay more than two million five hundred thousand dollars of the cost
of a single project or the cost of more than one project in any calendar year. Nothing in this
subparagraph (I) shall preclude any railroad corporation from voluntarily contributing more than
its allotted share for grade separation construction in one year, and, in such event, all amounts
contributed by such railroad exceeding its allotted share in any one year shall be credited to and
shall serve to reduce any payment for grade separation construction expenses by that railroad in
subsequent years.
(B) Repealed.
(II) If the cost of a project is such that it calls for payment by a railroad corporation in
more than one calendar year or if the amount due from the railroad corporation exceeds two
million five hundred thousand dollars and thus must be made in consecutive calendar years,
nothing in this section shall be construed to require that the approved project must be subjected
to reapplication or rereview by the commission.
(III) In determining how much of the total expense of the separation of grades shall be
paid by the railroad corporation or railroad corporations and by the state, county, municipality,
or public authority in interest, consideration shall be given to the benefits, if any, which accrue
from the grade separation project and the responsibility for need, if any, for such project. The
railroad corporation or railroad corporations and the state, county, municipality, or public
authority in interest shall share the costs for that portion of the project which separates the grades
and constructs the approaches thereto. The commission shall consider the costs of obtaining
rights-of-way, the costs of construction, and the costs of engineering. To the extent that the
requirements of the railroad corporation or railroad corporations and the state, county,
municipality, or public authority in interest generate additional costs beyond that necessary to
provide the grade separation, such costs shall be borne by the responsible entity.
(IV) This paragraph (b) shall not apply to any project for the elimination of hazards at
any railway-highway crossing when all or any part of the cost of such project will be paid from
moneys made available for expenditure under title 23, U.S.C.; except that any amount paid by a
railroad corporation for such an exempt project shall be credited against the two-million-five-
hundred-thousand-dollar cap set forth in subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (b).
(c) (I) The state, county, municipality, or public authority, at its discretion, may
withdraw its request for allocation determination at any time prior to the issue of the final order
of the commission.
(II) The state, county, municipality, or public authority, at its discretion, after the hearing
and prior to final order of the commission, may make a motion for a declaratory ruling on the
cost allocation. In response to such a request, the commission shall make a declaratory ruling
and shall provide the movant reasonable time to withdraw the request for allocation
determination.
(III) After the final order is issued, the project shall proceed, unless the commission
revises the order after consideration of a request for change by the state, county, municipality, or
public authority in interest.
(d) The commission shall not order the abolition of any crossing for which a grade
separation is determined to be necessary until this separation is constructed.
(e) and (f) Repealed.
(4) Repealed.

‹ Prev All Colorado sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.