(1) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 18-9-302 to 18-9-311, any supervising representative of a law enforcement agency shall have the authority to order a previously designated security employee of a communications or internet access provider to arrange, to the extent the necessary technology is reasonably available to the provider, to cut, reroute, or divert telephone lines or cellular or digital communications signals if the supervising representative has probable cause to believe that: (I) A person has taken one or more other persons hostage and is holding the hostages in the geographical area in which the supervising representative has jurisdiction; or (II) A person has barricaded himself or herself in a structure or a motor vehicle within the geographical area in which the supervising representative has jurisdiction and the supervising representative has a reasonable belief that the person is armed with a deadly weapon or explosive device and poses a danger to himself or herself or others. (b) The supervising representative of a law enforcement agency may order the cutting, rerouting, or diverting of telephone lines or cellular or digital communications signals pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subsection (1) only for the purpose of preventing telephone or other electronic, cellular, or digital communication by the hostage holder or the armed person with any person other than a peace officer or a person authorized by the peace officer. The communications or internet access provider shall restore the normal operations of the telephone lines or cellular or digital communications signals as soon as practicable following resolution of the exigent circumstances. (1.5) (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 18-9-302 to 18-9-311, any supervising representative of a law enforcement agency may order a previously designated security employee of a wireless telecommunications provider to provide to the law enforcement agency, without requiring the agency to obtain a court order, location information concerning the telecommunications device of a named person if the supervising representative has probable cause to believe that: (I) An emergency situation exists that involves the risk of death or serious bodily injury to the named person or to another person who is in the named person's company; and (II) The time required to obtain a search warrant or other court order authorizing the acquisition of the information would increase such risk. (b) A wireless telecommunications provider may establish protocols by which the provider discloses location information, provided that such protocols shall include keeping a record of: (I) The name of the supervising representative of a law enforcement agency that requested the location information; and (II) The time and date when the request was made. (c) With regard to compliance with the requirements of this subsection (1.5), no cause of action may be brought against any wireless telecommunications provider, its officers, employees, agents, or other specified persons for providing location information in response to a request from a law enforcement agent with actual or apparent authority to act as a supervising representative under this subsection (1.5). (d) A law enforcement agency that acquires information pursuant to this subsection (1.5) shall not divulge the acquired information to any person other than to another law enforcement agency, or an employee thereof, unless the law enforcement agency has obtained a court order stating that the information was lawfully obtained and authorizing the law enforcement agency to retain the information, as described in subparagraph (I) of paragraph (d) of this subsection (1.5). (e) (I) Not more than forty-eight hours after ordering a previously designated security employee of a wireless telecommunications provider to provide information as described in paragraph (a) of this subsection (1.5), a law enforcement agency shall request a court order stating whether: (A) At the time that the supervising representative of a law enforcement agency ordered the previously designated security employee of a wireless telecommunications provider to provide the information, the supervising representative had probable cause to believe that the conditions described in paragraph (a) of this subsection (1.5) existed; and (B) The law enforcement agency may retain the information for a bona fide investigative purpose. (II) Unless a court orders that the law enforcement agency may retain the information for a bona fide investigative purpose, as described in sub-subparagraph (B) of subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (e), the law enforcement agency shall destroy the information and not retain any copy of the information for any purpose. (III) If the court issues an order stating that the supervising representative of the law enforcement agency did not have probable cause to believe that the conditions described in paragraph (a) of this subsection (1.5) existed and that the information was not lawfully obtained, then neither the information nor any other evidence that is obtained as a result of the law enforcement agency's acquisition of the information may be admitted in any subsequent criminal proceeding unless the information or other evidence was also acquired independently in a lawful manner. (IV) Any ruling by a court that the information obtained may be retained for a bona fide investigative purpose shall not be considered a ruling on the admissibility of the evidence in any criminal proceeding under the constitutional and statutory provisions of the United States or Colorado. (2) The serving communications or internet access provider within the geographical area of a law enforcement agency shall designate a security official employed by the provider and an alternate to provide all required assistance to law enforcement officials to carry out the purposes of this section. (3) Good faith reliance on an order by any supervising representative of a law enforcement agency shall constitute a complete defense to any action brought against a communications or internet access provider or any of its employees or agents in connection with actions taken under this section. A communications or internet access provider and its employees or agents shall not be liable in any civil action to any person or entity for injuries, death, or loss to any person or property incurred as a result of any act or omission resulting from, connected with, or incidental to compliance with this section.
‹ Prev All Colorado sections Next ›
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.