Wisconsin Code § 295.60

Impacts to wetlands
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(1) DEFINITIONS. In this
section:
(a) “Artificial wetland” means a landscape feature where hydrophytic vegetation may be present as a result of human modifications to the landscape or hydrology and for which there is no
prior wetland or stream history.
(b) “Ceded territory” means the territory in Wisconsin ceded
by the Chippewa Indians to the United States in the treaty of
1837, 7 Stat. 536, and the treaty of 1842, 7 Stat. 591.
(c) “Federal wetland” means a wetland that is subject to federal jurisdiction under 33 USC 1344.
(d) “Fill material” has the meaning given in 33 CFR 323.2 (e),
as the meaning exists on July 1, 2012.
(e) “Mitigation” means the restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation of wetlands to compensate for adverse impacts to other wetlands.
(f) “Mitigation bank” means a system of accounting for wetland loss and compensation that includes one or more sites where
wetlands are restored, enhanced, created, or preserved to provide
credits to be subsequently applied or purchased in order to compensate for adverse impacts to other wetlands.
(g) “On-site location” means a location that is on a mining site
or within one-half mile of an outer boundary of a mining site.
(h) “Practicable” means reasonably available and capable of
being implemented after taking into consideration cost, site availability, available technology, logistics, and proximity to the proposed project site, in light of the overall purpose and scope of the
project.
(i) “Water basin” means the Lake Michigan basin, the Lake
Superior basin, or the Mississippi River basin or other water
basin established by the department.
(j) “Water management unit” means a subdivision of a water
basin that is established on a hydrological basis by the
department.
(k) “Water quality standard” means a wetland water quality
standard specified under sub. (5) or any other water quality standard set by rule under s. 281.15.
(L) “Wetland impact evaluation” means an evaluation of impacts to a wetland.
(1m) APPLICABILITY. Subsections (2) to (11) do not apply to
a wetland individual permit or other approval that requires a wetland impact evaluation if the operator files the application for the
wetland individual permit or other approval after the department
issues the mining permit for the mining operation.
(2) WETLAND DETERMINATIONS AND DELINEATIONS. For
purposes of this section, wetland determinations and wetland
boundary delineations shall be consistent with the U.S. army
corps of engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual and any
final regional supplement to the manual. Any owner or lessee of
land, or a holder of an easement in land, may request that the department provide a wetland determination or wetland boundary
delineation for an application for a wetland individual permit under this section or for another approval for which a wetland impact evaluation is required. The department may rely on wetland
determinations and wetland boundary delineations made by other
agencies and consultants. If the applicant has provided information to the department that is identified in the manual or any final
regional supplement as being sufficient to make a wetland determination or a delineation of boundaries, the department may visit
a mining site to conduct surveys or gather additional site-specific
quantitative data provided that the department does not discontinue the processing of the application to do so.
(3) SCOPE; DISCHARGES; OTHER IMPACTS. (a) Scope. Except
as otherwise provided under this section, this section applies to
wetland individual permits and any other approvals for which
wetland impact evaluations are required.
(b) Discharges of dredged or fill material. No person may
discharge dredged material or fill material associated with a mining operation or bulk sampling unless the discharge is authorized
under a wetland individual permit issued under this section or under a wetland general permit issued under s. 281.36 (3g). The department may not issue a wetland individual permit unless it
makes a finding under sub. (6) (a) that the discharge will comply
with all applicable water quality standards. Section 281.36 (3g)
and (11), and the rules promulgated under s. 281.36 (3g) and
(11), apply to authorizations to proceed under general permits.

Notwithstanding s. 281.36 (3g) (h) 2., a person receiving authorization to proceed under a wetland general permit for a mining
activity other than bulk sampling may not proceed until a mining
permit is issued.
(c) Other impacts. For an approval which requires a wetland
impact evaluation for an activity other than a discharge of
dredged material or fill material, the approval may not be issued
unless the department determines that the activity will comply
with all applicable water quality standards.
(4) REVIEW BY DEPARTMENT. (a) Avoidance or minimization
of impacts. When applying for a wetland individual permit or for
another approval for which a wetland impact evaluation is required, an applicant shall include in the application an analysis of
the practicable alternatives that will avoid and minimize the adverse impacts on wetland functional values and that will not result in any other significant adverse environmental consequences.
(b) Practicable alternatives. The department shall review the
analysis of practicable alternatives included in the application under par. (a). The department shall limit its review to those practicable alternatives that are located at the site of the discharge or
other activity and that are located adjacent to that site if the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed project causing the discharge or other activity will result in a demonstrable economic
public benefit.
(c) Assessing impacts. In its review under this subsection, the
department shall consider all of the following factors when it assesses the impacts to wetland functional values:
1. The direct impacts of the proposed discharge or other activity to wetland functional values.
2. The cumulative impacts attributable to the proposed discharge or other activity that may occur to wetland functional values based on past impacts or reasonably anticipated impacts
caused by similar discharges or activities in the area affected by
the discharge or activity.
3. Potential secondary impacts of the proposed discharge or
other activity to wetland functional values.
4. The impact on functional values resulting from the mitigation program under sub. (8).
5. The net positive or negative environmental impact of the
mining operation.
(d) Assessing impacts; geographical scope. In its review under this subsection, the department shall evaluate whether the
discharge or other activity will result in a significant adverse impact to wetland functional values by doing all of the following:
1. Comparing the functional values of the wetland with other
wetlands located within the boundaries of the mining site or
within the same water management unit as the mining site and
with other waters of the state that are located in the same water
management unit.
2. Taking into consideration the floristic province in which
the mining site is located.
(e) Method for assessing impacts. In issuing a wetland individual permit under this section or in conducting a wetland impact evaluation, the department shall determine the impact of a
proposed discharge or other activity upon the wetland functional
values by using wetland ecological evaluation methods that are
jointly accepted by the U.S. army corps of engineers and the department and that are appropriate to the affected wetland.
(f) General permits. Paragraphs (a) to (e) do not apply to authorizations to proceed under a general permit issued under s.
281.36 (3g).
(5) WETLAND WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. The following
wetland water quality standards apply to any wetland individual
permit issued under this section or to any wetland impact
evaluation:
(a) Adverse impacts to the functional values and water quality
of wetlands and adverse impacts to other waters of the state that
are influenced by wetlands shall be minimized, and any significant adverse impacts remaining after minimization shall be subject to a mitigation program under sub. (8). For purposes of this
section, functional values consist of all of the following:
1. Storm and flood water storage and retention and the moderation of water level fluctuation extremes.
2. Hydrologic functions including the maintenance of dry
season streamflow, the discharge of groundwater to a wetland, the
recharge of groundwater from a wetland to another area, and the
flow of groundwater through a wetland.
3. Filtration or storage of sediments, nutrients, or toxic substances that would otherwise adversely impact the quality of waters of the state.
4. Shoreline protection against erosion through the dissipation of wave energy and water velocity and anchoring of
sediments.
5. Habitat for aquatic organisms in the food web including
fish, crustaceans, mollusks, insects, annelids, and planktonic organisms and the plants and animals upon which these aquatic organisms feed and depend upon for their needs in all life stages.
6. Habitat for resident and transient wildlife species, including mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians, for breeding, resting, nesting, escape cover, travel corridors, and food.
7. Recreational, cultural, educational, scientific, and natural
scenic beauty values and uses.
(b) All of the following shall be minimized in order to avoid
significant adverse impacts for the purpose of maintaining or enhancing the wetland functional values identified under par. (a),
and any minimization of the following must be taken into account
in the department’s evaluation of significant adverse impacts:
1. The use of liquids, fill, or other solids or gases.
2. The presence of floating or submerged debris, oil, or other
material.
3. The use of materials producing color, odor, taste, or
unsightliness.
4. The presence of concentrations or combinations of substances that are toxic or harmful to human, animal, or plant life.
5. Adverse effects on hydrological conditions necessary to
support the biological and physical characteristics that are naturally present in wetlands. For purposes of this subdivision, the
hydrological conditions include all of the following:
a. Water currents and erosion and sedimentation patterns.
b. Water temperature variations.
c. The chemical, nutrient, and dissolved oxygen regime of
the wetland.
d. The movement of aquatic fauna.
e. The pH of the wetland.
f. Water levels or elevations.
6. Adverse effects on existing habitat and populations of animals and vegetation found in wetlands.
(6) DECISION BY DEPARTMENT. (a) The department shall
make a finding that a discharge of dredged material or fill material is in compliance with all applicable water quality standards
and shall issue a wetland individual permit if the department determines that all of the following apply:
1. The proposed project of which the discharge is a part represents the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative taking into consideration practicable alternatives that avoid
wetland impacts.

2. All practicable measures to minimize the adverse impacts
to wetland functional values will be taken.
3. The proposed discharge will not result in significant adverse impact to wetland functional values, subject to par. (b); in
significant adverse impact to water quality; or in other significant
adverse environmental consequences.
(b) Notwithstanding par. (a) 3., if significant adverse impacts
to wetland functional values will remain after the adverse impacts
have been avoided and minimized to the extent practicable, the
department shall issue the permit if the department determines
that the remaining impacts will be compensated for under a mitigation program under sub. (8).
(c) The department may not deny an approval for an activity
for which a wetland impact evaluation is required, other than a
discharge of dredged material or fill material, on the basis of the
impacts from the activity on wetlands if the department determines that all of the following apply:
1. The proposed project of which the activity is a part represents the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative
taking into consideration practicable alternatives that avoid wetland impacts.
2. All practicable measures to minimize the adverse impacts
to wetland functional values will be taken.
3. The proposed activity will not result in significant adverse
impact to wetland functional values, subject to par. (d); in significant adverse impact to water quality; or in other significant adverse environmental consequences.
(d) Notwithstanding par. (c) 3., if significant adverse impacts
to wetland functional values will remain after the adverse impacts
have been avoided and minimized to the extent practicable, the
department may not deny the permit on the basis of the impacts
from the activity on wetlands if the department determines that
the remaining impacts will be compensated for under a mitigation
program under sub. (8).
(e) Paragraphs (a) to (d) do not apply to authorizations to proceed under a general permit issued under s. 281.36 (3g).
(7) FEDERAL WETLANDS. (a) For a wetland individual permit
under this section which involves a federal wetland or for any
other approval for which a wetland impact evaluation for a federal
wetland is required, any mitigation program submitted by the applicant under sub. (8) shall include all the federal mitigation measures proposed by the applicant. The department shall review the
federal mitigation measures and shall determine whether it has
reasonable assurance that these will compensate for any significant adverse impacts to wetland functional values, any significant
adverse impacts to water quality, and any other significant adverse environmental consequences. The department shall recognize all federal compensatory mitigation measures as being eligible for the purpose of making this determination. If the department determines that reasonable assurance exists, the department
may not impose any additional conditions on the permit or other
approval. If the department determines that reasonable assurance
does not exist, it may impose conditions on the permit or other
approval that are in addition to required federal compensatory
mitigation measures, but such conditions shall be limited to those
that are necessary to compensate for any significant adverse impacts to wetland functional values, any significant adverse impacts to water quality, and any other significant adverse environmental consequences that will remain after completion of the federal mitigation measures. Any conditions imposed by the department may be satisfied through a mitigation program as provided
in sub. (8). In imposing any conditions under this paragraph, the
department may not require that the number of acres to be mitigated be greater than the number that is required under federal
law.
(b) A wetland individual permit issued under this section that
authorizes a discharge of dredged or fill material in a federal wetland constitutes water quality certification as required by 33 USC
1341 (a). Any other approval issued by the department for which
a wetland impact evaluation is required for a federal wetland constitutes water quality certification under 33 USC 1341 (a) with
respect to the discharges or activities affecting the federal
wetland.
(8) MITIGATION PROGRAM. (a) Definition. Notwithstanding
s. 295.60 (1) (i) , in this section “water basin” means the Lake
Michigan basin, the Lake Superior basin, or the Mississippi River
basin.
(am) Contents. A mitigation program to compensate for adverse impacts to functional values of wetlands shall contain proposed projects for mitigation and a schedule for implementing the
projects. The department may not consider mitigation in determining whether to grant authorization to proceed under a general
permit under s. 281.36 (3g). These projects may be performed by
a person other than the applicant, subject to the department’s approval of the projects and schedule.
(b) Option of applicant. An applicant submitting a program
under par. (am) may submit options for mitigation. These options
may include any combination of the types of mitigation specified
in par. (dm). In preparing the program, the applicant shall identify and consider mitigation that could be conducted within the
same watershed in which the mining site is located.
(c) Ratios for mitigation. The amount of mitigation required
may not exceed 1.5 acres of mitigation for each acre of adversely
impacted wetland. For purpose of credits in a mitigation bank,
each acre that is subject to mitigation shall count as at least one
credit.
(d) Sequence of mitigation. If it is not practicable or ecologically preferable to conduct mitigation at an on-site location or if
there is no on-site location that will provide sufficient wetland
acreage, the department shall require that the applicant conduct
mitigation within the same watershed in which the wetland to be
affected is located, unless mitigation in the same watershed is not
practicable or ecologically preferable. If mitigation within the
same watershed is not practicable or ecologically preferable, the
department shall require that the applicant conduct mitigation
within the same water basin in which the wetland to be affected is
located. If mitigation in the same water basin is not practicable or
ecologically preferable, the applicant may conduct mitigation at a
site elsewhere in the state.
(dm) Types of mitigation. Mitigation under a program under
par. (am) may be accomplished through any of the following
types:
1. Implementation of a project for mitigation by an applicant
or other person approved by the department.
2. Purchase of mitigation credits from a mitigation bank for a
site in a mitigation bank that is located anywhere in the state, subject to par. (e).
3. Purchase of mitigation credits from a mitigation bank established prior to February 1, 2002, if the department determines
that the bank sponsor is in compliance with any applicable memorandum of understanding between the bank sponsor and the
department.
4. Participation in the in lieu fee subprogram under s. 281.36
(3r) (e).
(e) Ceded territory. If a mining operation is located in whole
or in part within the ceded territory, any mitigation, including
mitigation accomplished through the purchase of mitigation bank
credits and the in lieu fee subprogram that is authorized or required by the department, that will be required to compensate for
adverse impacts to wetlands located in the ceded territory shall

occur within the ceded territory. If the department determines
under par. (d) that mitigation will occur within a certain watershed or water basin and if the watershed or water basin is not located totally in the ceded territory, the mitigation shall occur
within that part of the watershed or water basin that is located in
the ceded territory.
(9) SUBSEQUENT PROTECTION FOR WETLANDS. (a) If a wetland individual permit issued under this section, or other approval
that required a wetland impact evaluation, authorizes a mitigation
project, the person who is the holder of the permit or approval
shall grant a conservation easement under s. 700.40 to the department or shall execute a comparable legal instrument to ensure
that a wetland that is being restored, enhanced, created, or preserved will not be destroyed or substantially degraded by any subsequent proprietor of or holder of interest in the property on
which the wetland is located. The department shall suspend the
mining permit if the holder of the permit fails to grant the easement or execute this instrument within the time limit set forth in
the mining permit. If the holder subsequently grants the conservation easement or executes the instrument, the department shall
reinstate the mining permit.
(b) Notwithstanding par. (a), the department shall modify or
release a conservation easement granted under par. (a) or shall
void a comparable legal instrument executed under par. (a) if all
of the following apply:
1. The department determines that part or all of a wetland
subject to the mitigation project ceases to be a wetland.
2. The person who is required to grant the conservation easement or execute the legal instrument did not contribute to the loss
of the wetland specified in subd. 1.
3. Any subsequent proprietor of or holder of interest in the
property on which the wetland specified in subd. 1. is located did
not contribute to the loss of the wetland.
(10) EXEMPTIONS. (a) Artificial wetlands. All of the following artificial wetlands that are associated with a mining operation
or bulk sampling are exempt from the wetland individual permit
and mitigation requirements under this section, from the general
permit requirements under s. 281.36 (3g), and from any requirement for any other approval for which a wetland impact evaluation is required:
1. An artificial wetland that is a sedimentation or stormwater
detention basin or associated conveyance feature operated and
maintained only for sediment detention and flood storage
purposes.
2. An artificial wetland that is an active sewage lagoon, cooling pond, waste disposal pit, fish rearing pond, or landscape
pond.
3. An artificial wetland that is an actively maintained farm
drainage or roadside ditch.
4. An artificial wetland as part of an active mining operation.
(b) Other exempted activities. All of the following activities
that are associated with a mining operation or bulk sampling are
exempt from the wetland individual permit and mitigation requirements under this section, from the general permit requirements under s. 281.36 (3g), and from any requirement for any
other approval for which a wetland impact evaluation is required
if the applicant minimizes any adverse effect on the environment
as a result of any of these activities:
1. Maintenance, emergency repair, or reconstruction of damaged parts of structures that are in use in a wetland.
2. Construction or maintenance of irrigation ditches.
3. Construction or maintenance of farm roads, forest roads,
or temporary mining roads that is performed in accordance with
best management practices, as determined by the department.
4. Maintenance of drainage ditches.
(c) An exemption under par. (a) or (b) does not apply to a federal wetland if the exemption conflicts with 33 USC 1344.
(11) RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER LAWS. None of the following
apply to a mining operation or bulk sampling:
(a) Section 281.36, except as otherwise specifically provided
in this section.
(b) Any rule promulgated under s. 281.36, except as otherwise
specifically provided in this section.
(c) Any other rule promulgated by the department that relates
to wetlands that conflicts with this section.

‹ Prev All Wisconsin sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.