Wisconsin Code § 115.415

Educator effectiveness
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(1) (a) The department
shall develop an educator effectiveness evaluation system and an
equivalency process aligned with the department’s evaluation
system for the evaluation of teachers and principals of public
schools, including teachers and principals of a charter school established under s. 118.40 (2r) or (2x), as provided in this section.
Subject to par. (b), each school board and the operator of each
charter school established under s. 118.40 (2r) or (2x) shall evaluate teachers and principals in the school district or charter school
beginning in the 2014-15 school year.
(b) For the evaluation of teachers and principals in the 201920 school year, the school board and the operator of a charter
school established under s. 118.40 (2r) may not consider pupil
performance on statewide assessments administered under s.
118.30 in the 2019-20 school year and may not include pupil performance on those assessments in the evaluation score assigned
to a teacher or principal under the educator effectiveness evaluation system developed under this section.
(2) The department shall develop an educator effectiveness
evaluation system according to the following framework, and may
charge a fee to a school district and the governing board of a charter school established under s. 118.40 (2r) or (2x) to use the system developed under this subsection:
(a) Fifty percent of the total evaluation score assigned to a
teacher or principal shall be based upon measures of student performance, including performance on state assessments, districtwide assessments, student learning objectives, school-wide reading at the elementary and middle-school levels, and graduation
rates at the high school level.
(b) Fifty percent of the total evaluation score assigned to a
teacher or principal shall be based upon one of the following:
1. For a teacher, the extent to which the teacher’s practice
meets the core teaching standards adopted by the 2011 Interstate
Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium.
2. For a principal, the extent to which the principal’s practice
meets the 2008 Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium
Educational Leadership Policy Standards.
(c) A teacher or principal evaluated under this subsection
shall be placed in one of multiple performance categories.
(3) (a) The department shall promulgate by rule an equivalency process aligned with the evaluation system established under sub. (2) for a school district, a charter school under contract
with a school board that is not an instrumentality of the school
district, or a charter school established under s. 118.40 (2r) or
(2x) seeking to utilize an alternative process for the evaluation of
teacher and principal practice. The process under this subsection
shall be based on the criteria established in the 2011 Interstate
Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium and the 2008 Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium Educational Leadership Policy Standards, and a school district, charter school under
contract with a school board that is not an instrumentality of the
school district, or charter school established under s. 118.40 (2r)
or (2x) that uses the process under this subsection shall evaluate
the performance of teachers in the following domains:
1. Planning and preparation.
2. The classroom environment.
3. Instruction.
4. Professional responsibilities and development.
(b) A teacher or principal evaluated under this subsection
shall be placed in one of multiple performance categories.
(4) From the appropriation under s. 20.255 (2) (ek) , the department may award grants to school districts and the governing
board of a charter school established under s. 118.40 (2r) or (2x)
to implement an educator effectiveness evaluation system developed under sub. (2) or an equivalency process established by rule
under sub. (3).

‹ Prev All Wisconsin sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.