West Virginia Code § 30-1A-3

Analysis and evaluation of application
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(a) The Joint Standing Committee on Government Organization shall refer the completed
application of the professional or occupational group or organization to the Performance
Evaluation and Research Division of the Office of the Legislative Auditor.
(b) The Performance Evaluation and Research Division of the Office of the Legislative
Auditor shall conduct an analysis and evaluation of the application. The analysis and
evaluation shall be based upon the criteria listed in subsections (c) through subsection (k) of
this section. The Performance Evaluation and Research Division of the Office of the
Legislative Auditor shall submit a report, and such supporting muaterials as may be required,
to the Joint Standing Committee on Government Organization, as set out in this section.
(c) The Performance Evaluation and Research Division of the Office of the Legislative
Auditor shall determine if the proposed regulation meets the state's policy as set forth in
§30-1A-1(b) of this code of using the least restrictive regulation necessary to protect
consumers from present, significant, and substantilated harms.
(d) The Performance Evaluation and Research Division of the Office of the Legislative
Auditor's analysis in subsection (c) of this isection will use a rebuttable presumption that
consumers are sufficiently protectedg by market competition and private remedies, as listed
in §30-1A-1a(1) through §30-1A-1a(4) of this code. The Joint Standing Committee on
Government Organization will consider the use of private certification programs that allow a
provider to give consumers information about the provider's knowledge, skills, and
association with a private certification organization.
(e) The Performance Evaluation and Research Division of the Office of the Legislative
Auditor may rebut the presumption in subsection (d) of this section if it finds both credible
empirical evidence of present, significant, and substantiated harm, and that consumers do
not have the information and means to protect themselves against such harm. If evidence of
sucWh unmanageable harm is found, the committee may recommend the least restrictive
government regulation to address the harm, as listed in §30-1A-1a(5) through §30-1A-1a(16)
of this code.
(f) The Performance Evaluation and Research Division of the Office of the Legislative Auditor
will use the following guidelines to form its recommendation in subsection (j) or subsection
(k) of this section. If the harm arises from:
(1) Contractual disputes, including pricing disputes, the office may recommend enacting a
specific civil cause of action in small-claims court or circuit court to remedy consumer harm.
This cause of action may provide for reimbursement of attorney's fees or court costs, if a
consumer's claim is successful;
(2) Fraud, the office may recommend strengthening powers under the state's deceptive
trade practices acts or requiring disclosures that will reduce misleading attributes of the
specific good or service or other relevant recommendations;
(3) General health and safety risks, the office may recommend enacting a regulation on the
related process or requiring a facility license;
(4) A lack of protection for a person who is not a party to a contract between providers and
consumers, the office may recommend requiring the provider have insurance;
(5) A shortfall or imbalance in the consumer's knowledge about the good or service relative
to the provider's knowledge (asymmetrical information), the office may recommend enacting
government certification; u
(6) An inability to qualify providers of new or highly specialized medical services for
reimbursement by the state, the office may recommend enacting a specialty certification
solely for medical reimbursement; a
(7) A systematic information shortfall in which a relasonable consumer of the service is
permanently unable to distinguish between the quality of providers and there is an absence
of institutions that provide guidance to consumers, the office may recommend enacting an
occupational license; and i
(8) The need to address multiple types of harm, the office may recommend a combination of
regulations. This may include a government regulation combined with a private remedy
including third-party or consumer-created ratings and reviews, or private certification.
(g) The Performance Evaluation and Research Division and other relevant divisions of the
Office of the Legislative Auditor's analysis of the need for regulation in subsection (e) of this
section shall include the effects of legislation on opportunities for workers, consumer
choices and cVosts, general unemployment, market competition, governmental costs, and
other effects.
(h) The Performance Evaluation and Research Division of the Office of the Legislative
Auditor's analysis of the need for regulation in subsection (e) of this section should include
comparisons of the legislation to whether and how other states regulate the occupation,
including the occupation's scope of practice that other states use, and the personal
qualifications other states require.
(i) The Performance Evaluation and Research Division of the Office of the Legislative Auditor
may also request information from state agencies that contract with individuals in regulated
occupations and others knowledgeable of the occupation, labor market economics, or other
factors, including costs and benefits, a professional who works in the profession, a board
member who regulates the profession, and any other interested party.
(j) For an application proposing the regulation of an unregulated profession or occupation,
the Performance Evaluation and Research Division of the Office of the Legislative Auditor's
report shall include evaluation, analysis, and findings as to:
(1) Whether the unregulated practice of the occupation or profession clearly harms or
endangers the health, safety, or welfare of the public, and any evidence of present,
significant, and substantiated harms to consumers in the state;
(2) The requisite personal qualifications, if any;
(3) The scope of practice, if applicable;
(4) If regulation is required to address evidence of harm to consumers in the state, the least
restrictive regulation of the occupation or profession; and
(5) Whether the professional or occupational group or organization should be regulated as
proposed in the application.
(k) For an application proposing the establishment, revaision, or expansion of the scope of
practice of a regulated profession or occupation, the report shall include the evaluation,
analysis, and findings as set forth in subsection (j) lof this section inasmuch as applicable,
and a clear recommendation as to whether the scope of practice should be established,
revised, or expanded as proposed in the application.
(l) The Performance Evaluation and Research Division of the Office of the Legislative Auditor
shall submit its report to the Joint Standing Committee on Government Organization no later
than nine months after receiving the application for analysis.

‹ Prev All West Virginia sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.