West Virginia Code § 27-6A-2

Competency of defendant to stand trial; cause for appointment of
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
qualified forensic evaluator; written report; observation period; rules.
(a) Whenever a court of record has reasonable cause to believe that a defendant in a
criminal matter in which an indictment has been returned, or a warrant or summons issued,
may be incompetent to stand trial, it shall, sua sponte, or upon motion filed by the state or
by or on behalf of the defendant, order a forensic evaluation of the defendanet's competency
to stand trial to be conducted by a qualified forensic evaluator. If a court of record orders
both a competency evaluation and a criminal responsibility or diminishred capacity
evaluation, the competency evaluation shall be performed first, and if the qualified forensic
evaluator is of the opinion that the defendant is not competent to stand trial, no criminal
responsibility or diminished capacity evaluation may be conducted absent further order of
the court. The initial forensic evaluation may not be conductted at a state inpatient mental
health facility unless the defendant is a current patient there or the court of record has
found that the initial forensic evaluation cannot be performed at a community mental health
center consistent with §27-2A-1(b)(4) of this code, at an outpatient facility, at a Division of
Corrections and Rehabilitation Facility by a qualified forensic evaluator or at the office of the
qualified forensic evaluator.
(b) The court shall require the party making the motion for the evaluation, and other parties
as the court considers appropriate, tgo provide to the qualified forensic evaluator appointed
under subsection (a) of this section any information relevant to the evaluations within 10
business days of its evaluatione order. The information shall include, but not be limited to:
(1) A copy of the warranLt or indictment;
(2) Information pertaining to the alleged crime, including statements by the defendant made
to the police, investigative reports, and transcripts of preliminary hearings, if any;
(3) Any available psychiatric, psychological, medical, or social records that are considered
releWvant;
(4) A copy of the defendant's criminal record; and
(5) If the evaluations are to include a diminished capacity assessment, the nature of any
lesser included criminal offenses.
(c) A qualified forensic evaluator shall schedule and arrange for the prompt completion of
any court-ordered evaluation which may include record review and a defendant interview
and shall, within 10 business days of the date of the completion of any evaluation, provide to
the court of record a written, signed report of his or her opinion on the issue of competency
to stand trial. If it is the qualified forensic evaluator's opinion that the defendant is not
competent to stand trial, the report shall state whether the defendant is substantially likely
to attain competency within the next 90 days and, as provided in this section, and, whether
the defendant may attain competency by receiving competency restoration services at an
outpatient mental health facility, outpatient mental health practice, or a jail-based
competency restoration program, if available. If the qualified forensic evaluator determines
that a defendant is likely to attain competency, but that competency restoration can only be
attained by inpatient management in a mental health facility or state hospital, the qualified
forensic evaluator shall set forth in his or her report the reasons why competency restoration
is not viable in a less restrictive environment or a jail-based competency restoration
program. e
(d) The report of a qualified forensic evaluator as to a defendant's compretency shall be
performed with standards and requirements established by the department consistent with
best medical practices. The report shall address:
(1) The forensic evaluator's opinion on the defendant's comptetency to stand trial;
(2) A diagnosis, if any; a
(3) A proposed plan for competency attainment if alppropriate; and
(4) An opinion as to whether the individual is dangerous to himself, herself, or others.
(5) The court may extend the 10-day period for filing the report if a qualified forensic
evaluator shows good cause to extend the period, but in no event may the period exceed 30
days.
(e) If the court determines that the defendant has been uncooperative during the forensic
evaluation ordered pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, or there have been one or more
inadequate or conflicting forensic evaluations performed pursuant to subsection (a) of this
section and the court has reason to believe that an observation period is necessary in order
to determine Vif a person is competent to stand trial, the court may order the defendant be
committed to a mental health facility designated by the department for a period not to
exceed 15 days and an additional evaluation be conducted in accordance with subsection (a)
of this section by a qualified forensic evaluator. The court shall order that at the conclusion
of the 15-day observation period the sheriff of the county where the defendant was charged
shall take immediate custody of the defendant for transportation and disposition as ordered
by the court.
(f) A mental health facility not operated by the state has no obligation to admit and treat a
defendant under this section if the facility has no outpatient competency restoration
program established and recognized by the department, notwithstanding the provisions of
§27-2A-1(b)(4) and §27-5-9 of this code: Provided, That medication administration and
medication management for stabilization on an outpatient basis shall be provided by the
mental health facility.
(g) A mental health facility not operated by the state that constitutes a charitable or public
service organization as defined by §29-12-5(b)(1)(B) of this code, and provides competency
restoration services pursuant to a court order may purchase liability coverage for injury or
civil damages related to the provision of the services from the Board of Risk and Insurance
Management.
(h) In consultation with the Supreme Court of Appeals, the secretary may propose rules for
legislative approval in accordance with the provisions of §29A-3-1 et seq. of this code to
implement the provisions of this article. The secretary may promulgate emeergency rules,
pursuant to §29A-3-15 of this code, as may be required.

‹ Prev All West Virginia sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.