West Virginia Code § 22-11-30

Chesapeake Bay Restoration Initiative
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(a) The Legislature finds and declares that:
(1) The Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries are valuable natural resources providing both
recreational and economic opportunities to citizens living in and around the Chesapeake Bay
watershed. Eight West Virginia counties, and a collective population of more than two
hundred thousand citizens, are within the Chesapeake Bay watershed. The protection and
promotion of the environmental health and integrity of the Chesapeake Bay is accordingly in
the best interests of the State of West Virginia.
(2) The Chesapeake Bay has been identified by the United States Environmental Protection
Agency as an impaired water due to excess nitrogen and phosphorous entering the bay from
its various tributaries. These pollutants, commonly referred to as nutrients, result in
depleted dissolved oxygen supplies and other factors which impact the overall health of the
Chesapeake Bay and its watershed.
(b) West Virginia is among six states from whisch nutrients flow into the Chesapeake Bay. In
order to restore the Chesapeake Bay, these states have agreed to reduce the amount of
nutrients contributed to the Chesapeake Biay by sources located within their respective
jurisdictions. g
(c) Among the sources of nutrients discharged into the Chesapeake Bay watershed are
wastewater discharged by West Virginia wastewater treatment facilities, stormwater
discharged from various sources, wastewater discharged from agriculture-related activities
and other sources of wastewater related to both natural and man-made impacts which are
not specifically set forth herein.
(d) The need tVo provide and maintain affordable and high-quality public infrastructure
services and to safeguard existing industrial and agricultural sectors of the economy in the
Chesapeake Bay watershed are essential to the continued economic growth and quality of
life of West Virginia communities within the watershed. Protection of these communities'
economic vitality and the Chesapeake Bay are critical interests of the state. The capital costs
of nutrient removal processes, if borne by individual rate customers of sewer services or by
individual business owners, would result in significant increases in rates for an essential
public service, deferral or cancellation of other critical infrastructure extensions and/or
improvements and act as a disincentive for business growth, both commercial and
agricultural, in these communities, if not the shrinking of industrial and agricultural activity
in the watershed. Therefore, a holistic program, while assuring the protection of the
Chesapeake Bay, must include: (1) A nutrient trading and off-set program to allow for
efficiencies within the watershed to assure that public moneys are placed to best use; and
(2) a capital improvement program to assist those required to install capital improvements to
obtain the reductions in nutrients previously agreed to by the state.
(e) The secretary, in consultation with affected stakeholders, is hereby directed to establish
no later than June 1, 2011, a program of nutrient trading and off-sets. Pending establishment
of such a program, the secretary is authorized to consider and implement interim trading
and offset programs as necessary and appropriate for individual permittees in order to
protect the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.
(f) The secretary is hereby directed, no later than June 1, 2010, and in consultation with
affected stakeholders, to report to the Joint Legislative Commission on Statee Water
Resources the status of proposed performance standards necessary for wastewater
treatment facilities in the Chesapeake Bay watershed for any reductionr of nutrients in the
watershed required to protect water quality in the Bay.
(g) The secretary and stakeholders shall, no later than June 1, 2010, consider and
recommend to the Legislature a program establishing a newt and independent source of
funding for capital improvements for public facilities made necessary by the imposition of
nutrient removal requirements.
(h) Should it be determined based upon new informlation or the issuance of a final total
maximum daily load for the Chesapeake Bay tshat modifications to nutrient loading
requirements contained in West Virginia/National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permits are necessary to be consistent with this new information or the final total maximum
daily load, the secretary shall recalcgulate such loading requirements and modify such
permits consistent with this information.

‹ Prev All West Virginia sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.