West Virginia Code § 11-24-4b

Dividends paid deduction to be added back in determining net income
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
for captive real estate investment trusts and regulated investment companies;
deductible intangible expenses and deductible interest paid to be added back in
determining net income of certain entities.
(a) The dividend paid deduction otherwise allowed by federal law in computing net income of
a real estate investment trust that is subject to federal income tax shall be aedded back in
computing the tax imposed by this article if the real estate investment trust is a captive real
estate investment trust. r
(b) The dividend paid deduction otherwise allowed by federal lawu in computing net income of
a regulated investment company that is subject to federal income tax shall be added back in
computing the tax imposed by this article unless the regulatted investment company is a
qualified regulated investment company as defined in this article.
(c) Intangible expenses otherwise deductible to be added back for certain taxpayers. --
(1) For purposes of computing its net income sunder this chapter, a taxpayer shall add back
otherwise deductible intangible expense directly or indirectly paid, accrued or incurred in
connection with one or more direct or indiirect transactions with one or more related
members. g
(2) If the related member was subject to tax in this state or another state or possession of
the United States or a foreign nation or some combination thereof on a tax base that
included the intangible expense paid, accrued or incurred by the taxpayer, the taxpayer shall
receive a credit against tax due in this state in an amount equal to the higher of the tax paid
by the related member with respect to the portion of its income representing the intangible
expense paid, accrued or incurred by the taxpayer, or the tax that would have been paid by
the related member with respect to that portion of its income if: (A) That portion of its
income had not been offset by expenses or losses; or (B) the tax liability had not been offset
by aW credit or credits. The credit determined shall be multiplied by the apportionment factor
of the taxpayer in this state. However, in no case shall the credit exceed the taxpayer's
liability in this state attributable to the net income taxed as a result of the adjustment
required by subdivision (1) of this subsection.
(3) (A) The adjustment required in subdivision (1) of this subsection and the credit allowed in
subdivision (2) of this subsection shall not apply to the portion of the intangible expense that
the taxpayer establishes by clear and convincing evidence meets both of the following
requirements: (i) The related member during the same taxable year directly or indirectly
paid, accrued or incurred a portion to a person that is not a related member; and (ii) the
transaction giving rise to the intangible expense between the taxpayer and the related
member was undertaken for a valid business purpose.
(B) The adjustment required in subdivision (1) of this subsection and the credit allowed in
subdivision (2) of this subsection shall not apply if the taxpayer establishes by clear and
convincing evidence of the type and in the form specified by the Tax Commissioner that: (i)
The related member was subject to tax on its net income in this state or another state or
possession of the United States or some combination thereof; (ii) the tax base for said tax
included the intangible expense paid, accrued or incurred by the taxpayer; and (iii) the
aggregate effective rate of tax applied to the related member is no less than the tax rate
imposed under this article.
(C) The adjustment required in subdivision (1) of this subsection and the credit allowed in
subdivision (2) of this subsection shall not apply if the taxpayer establisrhes by clear and
convincing evidence of the type and in the form specified by the commissioner that: (i) The
intangible expense was paid, accrued or incurred to a related member organized under the
laws of a country other than the United States; (ii) the related member's income from the
transaction was subject to a comprehensive income tax treatty between that country and the
United States; (iii) the related member's income from the transaction was taxed in that
country at a tax rate at least equal to that imposed by this state; and (iv) the intangible
expense was paid, accrued or incurred pursuant to a transaction that was undertaken for a
valid business purpose and using terms that reflect an arm's length relationship.
(D) The adjustment required in subdivision (1) of this subsection and the credit allowed in
subdivision (2) of this subsection shall not apply if the corporation and the commissioner
agree in writing to the application ogr use of alternative adjustments or computations. The
commissioner may, in his or her discretion, agree to the application or use of alternative
adjustments or computations wehen he or she concludes that in the absence of agreement the
income of the taxpayer would not be reflected accurately.
(d) Interest expense otherwise deductible to be added back for certain taxpayers. --
(1) For purposes of computing its net income under this chapter, a taxpayer shall add back
otherwise deductible interest paid, accrued or incurred to a related member during the
taxable year.
(2) If the related member was subject to tax in this state or another state or possession of
the United States or a foreign nation or some combination thereof on a tax base that
included the interest expense paid, accrued or incurred by the taxpayer, the taxpayer shall
receive a credit against tax due in this state equal to the higher of the tax paid by the related
member with respect to the portion of its income representing the interest expense paid,
accrued or incurred by the taxpayer, or the tax that would have been paid by the related
member with respect to that portion of its income if: (A) That portion of its income had not
been offset by expenses or losses; or (B) the tax liability had not been offset by a credit or
credits. The credit determined shall be multiplied by the apportionment factor of the
taxpayer in this state. However, in no case shall the credit exceed the taxpayer's liability in
this state attributable to the tax imposed under this article as a result of the adjustment
required by subdivision (1) of this subsection.
(3) (A) The adjustment required in subdivision (1) of this subsection and the credit allowed in
subdivision (2) of this subsection shall not apply if the taxpayer establishes by clear and
convincing evidence, of the type and in the form determined by the commissioner, that: (i)
The transaction giving rise to interest expense between the taxpayer and the related
member was undertaken for a valid business purpose; and (ii) the interest expense was paid,
accrued or incurred using terms that reflect an arm's length relationship.
(B) The adjustment required in subdivision (1) of this subsection and the creedit allowed in
subdivision (2) of this subsection shall not apply if the taxpayer establishes by clear and
convincing evidence of the type and in the form specified by the commirssioner that: (i) The
related member was subject to tax on its net income in this state or another state or
possession of the United States or some combination thereof; (ii) the tax base for said tax
included the interest expense paid, accrued or incurred by the taxpayer; and (iii) the
aggregate effective rate of tax applied to the related membetr is no less than the statutory
rate of tax applied to the taxpayer under this chapter.
(C) The adjustment required in subdivision (1) of this subsection and the credit allowed in
subdivision (2) of this subsection shall not apply if the taxpayer establishes by clear and
convincing evidence of the type and in the forsm specified by the commissioner that: (i) The
interest expense is paid, accrued or incurred to a related member organized under the laws
of a country other than the United States; (ii) the related member's income from the
transaction is subject to a comprehegnsive income tax treaty between that country and the
United States; (iii) the related member's income from the transaction is taxed in that country
at a tax rate at least equal to tehat imposed by this state; and (iv) the interest expense was
paid, accrued or incurred pursuant to a transaction that was undertaken for a valid business
purpose and using termLs that reflect an arm's length relationship.
(D) The adjustment required in subdivision (1) of this subsection and the credit allowed in
subdivision (2) of this subsection shall not apply if the corporation and the commissioner
agree in writing to the application or use of alternative adjustments or computations. The
commissioner may, in his or her discretion, agree to the application or use of alternative
adjuWstments or computations when he or she concludes that in the absence of agreement the
income of the taxpayer would not be properly reflected.
(e) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit or negate the commissioner's
authority to otherwise enter into agreements and compromises otherwise allowed by law.
(f) Effective date. -- The amendments to this section made in the year 2009 are retroactive
and are effective for tax years beginning on and after January 1, 2009.

‹ Prev All West Virginia sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.