Utah Code § 75A-9-115

Validity of advance health care directive -- Conflict with other law
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(1) An advance health care directive created outside this state is valid if it complies with:
(a) the law of the state specified in the directive or, if a state is not specified, the state in which
the individual created the directive; or
(b) this chapter.
(2) A person may assume without inquiry that an advance health care directive is genuine, valid,
and still in effect, and may implement and rely on it, unless the person has good cause to
believe the directive is invalid or has been revoked.
(3) An advance health care directive, revocation of a directive, or a signature on a directive or
revocation may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic
form.
(4) Evidence relating to an advance health care directive, revocation of a directive, or a signature
on a directive or revocation may not be excluded in a proceeding solely because the evidence
is in electronic form.
(5) This chapter does not affect the validity of an electronic record or signature that is valid under
Title 46, Chapter 4, Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.
(6) If this chapter conflicts with other law of this state relating to the creation, execution,
implementation, or revocation of an advance health care directive, this chapter prevails.

‹ Prev All Utah sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.