Utah Code § 75-3-203

Priority among persons seeking appointment as personal representative
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(1) Whether the proceedings are formal or informal, persons who are not disqualified have priority
for appointment in the following order:
(a) the person with priority as determined by a probated will, including a person nominated by a
power conferred in a will;
(b) the surviving spouse of the decedent who is a devisee of the decedent;
(c) other devisees of the decedent;
(d) the surviving spouse of the decedent;
(e) other heirs of the decedent;
(f) 45 days after the death of the decedent, any creditor.
(2) An objection to an appointment can be made only in formal proceedings. In case of objection
the priorities stated in Subsection (1) apply except that:
(a) If the estate appears to be more than adequate to meet exemptions and costs of
administration but inadequate to discharge anticipated unsecured claims, the court, on
petition of creditors, may appoint any qualified person;
(b) In case of objection to appointment of a person other than one whose priority is determined
by will by an heir or devisee appearing to have a substantial interest in the estate, the court
may appoint a person who is acceptable to heirs and devisees whose interests in the estate
appear to be worth in total more than one-half of the probable distributable value, or, in
default of this accord, any suitable person.
(3) A person entitled to letters under Subsections (1)(b) through (1)(f) and a person aged 18 and
over who would be entitled to letters but for his age, may nominate a qualified person to act as
personal representative. Any person aged 18 and over may renounce his right to nominate or to
an appointment by appropriate writing filed with the court. When two or more persons share a
priority, those of them who do not renounce must concur in nominating another to act for them
or in applying for appointment in informal proceedings. When two or more persons share a
priority, any one or more of them who do not renounce may nominate another to act or apply
for appointment in formal proceedings. Before appointing fewer than all persons who share a
priority and who have not renounced or nominated another, the court must determine that those
sharing the priority, although given notice of the formal proceedings, have failed to request
appointment or to nominate another for appointment, and that administration is necessary.
(4) Conservators of the estates of protected persons, or if there is no conservator, any guardian,
except a guardian ad litem of a minor or incapacitated person, may exercise the same right to
nominate, to object to another's appointment, or to participate in determining the preference of
a majority in interest of the heirs and devisees that the protected person or ward would have if
qualified for appointment.
(5) Appointment of one who does not have priority under Subsection (1) or priority resulting from
renunciation or nomination determined pursuant to this section may be made only in formal
proceedings. Before appointing one without priority, the court must determine that those having

priority, although given notice of the proceedings, have failed to request appointment or to
nominate another for appointment, and that administration is necessary.
(6) No person is qualified to serve as a personal representative who is:
(a) under the age of 21;
(b) a person whom the court finds unsuitable in formal proceedings.
(7) A personal representative appointed by a court of the decedent's domicile has priority
over all other persons except where the decedent's will nominates different persons to be
personal representative in this state and in the state of domicile. The domiciliary personal
representative may nominate another, who shall have the same priority as the domiciliary
personal representative.
(8) This section governs priority for appointment of a successor personal representative but does
not apply to the selection of a special administrator.

‹ Prev All Utah sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.