Utah Code § 70A-3-311

Accord and satisfaction by use of instrument
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(1) If a person against whom a claim is asserted proves that that person in good faith tendered
an instrument to the claimant as full satisfaction of the claim, the amount of the claim was
unliquidated or subject to a bona fide dispute, and the claimant obtained payment of the
instrument, the following subsections apply.
(2) Unless Subsection (3) applies, the claim is discharged if the person against whom the claim is
asserted proves that the instrument or an accompanying written communication contained a
conspicuous statement to the effect that the instrument was tendered as full satisfaction of the
claim.
(3) Subject to Subsection (4), a claim is not discharged under Subsection (2) if either of the
following applies:
(a) The claimant, if an organization, proves that:
(i) within a reasonable time before the tender, the claimant sent a conspicuous statement to the
person against whom the claim is asserted, which states that communications concerning
disputed debts, including an instrument tendered as full satisfaction of a debt, are to be sent
to a designated person, office, or place; and

(ii) the instrument or accompanying communication was not received by that designated
person, office, or place.
(b) The claimant, whether or not an organization, proves that within 90 days after payment of the
instrument, the claimant tendered repayment of the amount of the instrument to the person
against whom the claim is asserted. This Subsection (3)(b) does not apply if the claimant is
an organization that sent a statement complying with Subsection (3)(a)(i).
(4) A claim is discharged if the person against whom the claim is asserted proves that within a
reasonable time before collection of the instrument was initiated, the claimant, or an agent of
the claimant having direct responsibility with respect to the disputed obligation, knew that the
instrument was tendered in full satisfaction of the claim.
(5) Merely writing a statement on a check which declares that a child support obligation is paid in
full is not sufficient to bind the recipient who endorses the check. Child support obligations are
considered owing unless paid in full or otherwise ordered by a tribunal.

‹ Prev All Utah sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.