Utah Code § 65A-17-304

Concurrent operations -- Breach, disagreement, or conflict -- Disputes
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(1) Two or more operators may conduct concurrent operations on the Great Salt Lake under a
cooperative agreement upon stipulation and agreement that the operations can be:
(a) conducted simultaneously without unreasonably interfering with the value of the resources
being produced;
(b) conducted simultaneously without unreasonably interfering with natural resources of the
Great Salt Lake; and
(c) conducted without unreasonably interfering with, or unnecessarily raising the cost of
operations of another operator, unless the other affected operator is compensated for
increased costs or diminished returns.
(2) The division shall make rules, in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative
Rulemaking Act, providing for the procedures the division and operators shall follow to:
(a) enable the division to enforce applicable statutes and rules on operators, including the
issuance of notices of violation or cessation orders;
(b) assist in the timely resolution of disputes that may arise during the formation of a cooperative
agreement;
(c) cure a breach of a mitigation plan; or

(d) resolve a continued disagreement or conflict regarding continued negative impacts to biota or
chemistry due to continuing concurrent operations.
(3) If any dispute between operators under Subsection (2) has not been resolved through an
informal administrative dispute resolution process created by the division, the division shall
resolve the dispute by a final record of decision to be issued no more than 30 days after notice
to the division by an aggrieved operator that informal dispute resolution has been unsuccessful.

‹ Prev All Utah sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.