Utah Code § 17-79-706

Review of subdivision applications and subdivision improvement plans
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(1) As used in this section:
(a) "Review cycle" means the occurrence of:
(i) the applicant's submittal of a complete subdivision application;
(ii) the county's review of that subdivision application;
(iii) the county's response to that subdivision application, in accordance with this section; and
(iv) the applicant's reply to the county's response that addresses each of the county's required
modifications or requests for additional information.
(b) "Subdivision application" means a land use application for the subdivision of land located
within the unincorporated area of a county.
(c) "Subdivision improvement plans" means the civil engineering plans associated with required
infrastructure improvements and county-controlled utilities required for a subdivision.
(d) "Subdivision ordinance review" means review by a county to verify that a subdivision
application meets the criteria of the county's ordinances.
(e) "Subdivision plan review" means a review of the applicant's subdivision improvement plans
and other aspects of the subdivision application to verify that the application complies with
county ordinances and applicable installation standards and inspection specifications for
infrastructure improvements.
(2) The review cycle restrictions and requirements of this section do not apply to the review of
subdivision applications affecting property within identified geological hazard areas.
(3)
(a) A county may require a subdivision improvement plan to be submitted with a subdivision
application.
(b) A county may not require a subdivision improvement plan to be submitted with both a
preliminary subdivision application and a final subdivision application.
(4)
(a) The review cycle requirements of this section apply:
(i) to the review of a preliminary subdivision application, if the county requires a subdivision
improvement plan to be submitted with a preliminary subdivision application; or
(ii) to the review of a final subdivision application, if the county requires a subdivision
improvement plan to be submitted with a final subdivision application.
(b) A county may not, outside the review cycle, engage in a substantive review of required
infrastructure improvements or a county controlled utility.
(5)
(a) A county shall complete the initial review of a complete subdivision application submitted for
ordinance review for a residential subdivision for single-family dwellings, two-family dwellings,
or town homes:
(i) no later than 15 business days after the complete subdivision application is submitted, if the
county has a population over 5,000; or
(ii) no later than 30 business days after the complete subdivision application is submitted, if the
county has a population of 5,000 or less.

(b) A county shall maintain and publish a list of the items comprising the complete subdivision
application, including:
(i) the application;
(ii) the owner's affidavit;
(iii) an electronic copy of all plans in PDF format;
(iv) the preliminary subdivision plat drawings; and
(v) a breakdown of fees due upon approval of the application.
(6) A county shall publish a list of the items that comprise a complete subdivision land use
application.
(7) A county shall complete a subdivision plan review of a subdivision improvement plan that is
submitted with a complete subdivision application for a residential subdivision for single-family
dwellings, two-family dwellings, or town homes:
(a) within 20 business days after the complete subdivision application is submitted, if the county
has a population over 5,000; or
(b) within 40 business days after the complete subdivision application is submitted, if the county
has a population of 5,000 or less.
(8)
(a) In reviewing a subdivision application, a county may require:
(i) additional information relating to an applicant's plans to ensure compliance with county
ordinances and approved standards and specifications for construction of public
improvements; and
(ii) modifications to plans that do not meet current ordinances, applicable standards, or
specifications or do not contain complete information.
(b) A county's request for additional information or modifications to plans under Subsection (8)(a)
(i) or (ii) shall be specific and include citations to ordinances, standards, or specifications that
require the modifications to subdivision improvement plans, and shall be logged in an index of
requested modifications or additions.
(c) A county may not require more than four review cycles for a subdivision improvement plan
review.
(d)
(i) Subject to Subsection (8)(d)(ii), unless the change or correction is necessitated by the
applicant's adjustment to a subdivision improvement plan or an update to a phasing plan
that adjusts the infrastructure needed for the specific development, a change or correction
not addressed or referenced in a county's subdivision improvement plan review is waived.
(ii) A modification or correction necessary to protect public health and safety or to enforce state
or federal law may not be waived.
(iii) If an applicant makes a material change to a subdivision improvement plan, the county has
the discretion to restart the review process at the first review of the subdivision improvement
plan review, but only with respect to the portion of the subdivision improvement plan that the
material change substantively affects.
(e)
(i) This Subsection (8) applies if an applicant does not submit a revised subdivision
improvement plan within:
(A) 20 business days after the county requires a modification or correction, if the county has a
population over 5,000; or
(B) 40 business days after the county requires a modification or correction, if the county has a
population of 5,000 or less.

(ii) If an applicant does not submit a revised subdivision improvement plan within the time
specified in Subsection (8)(e)(i), a county has an additional 20 business days after the time
specified in Subsection (7) to respond to a revised subdivision improvement plan.
(9) After the applicant has responded to the final review cycle, and the applicant has complied with
each modification requested in the county's previous review cycle, the county may not require
additional revisions if the applicant has not materially changed the plan, other than changes
that were in response to requested modifications or corrections.
(10)
(a) In addition to revised plans, an applicant shall provide a written explanation in response to the
county's review comments, identifying and explaining the applicant's revisions and reasons
for declining to make revisions, if any.
(b) The applicant's written explanation shall be comprehensive and specific, including citations
to applicable standards and ordinances for the design and an index of requested revisions or
additions for each required correction.
(c) If an applicant fails to address a review comment in the response, the review cycle is not
complete and the subsequent review cycle may not begin until all comments are addressed.
(11) If, on the fourth or final review, a county fails to respond within 20 business days, the county
shall, upon request of the property owner, and within 10 business days after the day on which
the request is received:
(a) for a dispute arising from the subdivision improvement plans, assemble an appeal panel in
accordance with Subsection 17-79-812(4)(d) to review and approve or deny the final revised
set of plans; or
(b) for a dispute arising from the subdivision ordinance review, advise the applicant, in writing, of
the deficiency in the application and of the right to appeal the determination to a designated
appeal authority.

‹ Prev All Utah sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.