For recoupment or chargeback, the following criteria apply: (1) Audit parameters shall consider consumer-oriented parameters based on manufacturer listings; (2) A pharmacy's usual and customary price for compounded medications is considered the reimbursable cost unless the pricing methodology is outlined in the provider contract; (3) A finding of overpayment or underpayment can only be based on the actual overpayment or underpayment and not a projection based on the number of patients served having a similar diagnosis or on the number of similar orders or refills for similar drugs; (4) The entity conducting the audit may not use extrapolation in calculating the recoupment or penalties for audits unless required by state or federal law or regulation; (5) Calculations of overpayments may not include dispensing fees unless: (a) A prescription was not actually dispensed; (b) The prescriber denied authorization; (c) The prescription dispensed was a medication error by the pharmacy; or (d) The identified overpayment is solely based on an extra dispensing fee; (6) An entity may not consider any clerical or record-keeping error, such as a typographical error, scrivener's error, or computer error regarding a required document or record as fraud. However, such errors may be subject to recoupment; (7) In the case of errors that have no actual financial harm to the patient or plan, the pharmacy benefits manager may not assess any chargebacks. Errors that are a result of the pharmacy's failing to comply with a formal corrective action plan may be subject to recovery; and (8) Interest may not accrue during the audit period for either party. The audit period begins with the notice of the audit and ends with the final audit report.
‹ Prev All South Dakota sections Next ›
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.