Oklahoma Code § 76-91

Title 76. Torts: Legislative findings
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
A.  FINDINGS.  The Legislature finds that:
1.  Asbestos is a mineral that was widely used prior to the
1980s for insulation, fire-proofing, and other purposes;
2.  Millions of American workers and others were exposed to
asbestos, especially during and after World War II, prior to the
advent of regulation by the United States Occupational Safety and
Health Administration in the early 1970s;

3.  Exposure to asbestos is associated with various types of
cancer, including mesothelioma, as well as nonmalignant conditions
such as asbestosis and diffuse pleural thickening;
4.  Diseases caused by asbestos exposure often have long latency
periods;
5.  While the cases currently filed in Oklahoma are manageable
by the courts and the litigants, it is proper for the Legislature to
support and protect the courts of this state from the potential of
massive litigation expense and the crowding of trial dockets;
6.  Silica is a naturally occurring mineral and is the second
most common constituent of the earth's crust.  Crystalline silica in
the form of quartz is present in sand, gravel, soil, and rocks;
7.  Silica-related illnesses, including silicosis, can develop
from the inhalation of respirable silica dust.  Silicosis was widely
recognized as an occupational disease many years ago;
8.  Concerns about statutes of limitations may prompt unimpaired
asbestos and silica claimants to bring lawsuits to protect their
ability to recover for their potentially progressive occupational
disease; and
9.  Several states, including Texas, Georgia, Ohio, and Florida
have enacted legislation setting medical criteria governing asbestos
and silica cases and tolling statutes of limitations and requiring
persons alleging nonmalignant disease claims to demonstrate physical
impairment as a prerequisite to setting such cases for trial.
B.  The purpose of this chapter is to:
1.  Provide a procedural remedy allowing efficient judicial
supervision and control of asbestos and silica litigation by giving
priority for the purposes of trial and resolution to asbestos and
silica claimants with demonstrable physical impairment caused by
exposure to asbestos or silica; and
2.  Preserve the legal rights of claimants who were exposed to
asbestos or silica, but have no physical impairment from asbestos or
silica exposure, until such time as the claimant can demonstrate
physical impairment.
Added by Laws 2013, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 21, § 3, emerg. eff. Sept. 10,
2013.
NOTE:  Text formerly resided under repealed Title 76, § 61, which
was derived from Laws 2009, c. 228, § 55, which was held
unconstitutional by the Oklahoma Supreme Court in the case of
Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc., 2013 OK 37, 302 P.2d 789
(Okla. 2013).

‹ Prev All Oklahoma sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.