Oklahoma Code § 74-150.37

Title 74. State Government: Definitions - Accreditation - Evidence in criminal
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
trials.
A.  For purposes of this act:
1.  “ABFT” shall mean the American Board of Forensic Toxicology,
an accrediting body for toxicology;
2.  “Accredited” shall mean recognized formally by an
accrediting body as meeting or exceeding applicable quality
standards;
3.  “Accrediting body” shall mean a nationally recognized
organization that has developed and maintained an independent
system, based upon ISO/IEC 17025 standards, for providing
laboratories with an impartial review of laboratory operations and
that provides formal recognition or certification to laboratories
who demonstrate continued compliance with those standards and other
supplemental forensic standards which are specific to the
maintenance and testing of forensic evidence;
4.  “ISO/IEC 17025” shall mean the International Organization of
Standards/International Electrotechnical Commission standard 17025
that is published by the International Organization for
Standardization and the International Electrotechnical Commission
and included as a standard in general requirements for the
competence of testing and calibration laboratories;

5.  “Forensic laboratory” shall mean a laboratory operated by
the state or any unit of municipal, county, city or other local
government that examines physical evidence in criminal matters and
provides opinion testimony in a court of law;
6.  “Toxicology analysis” shall mean a laboratory analysis
whereby biological samples are tested for alcohol and/or other toxic
or intoxicating substances;
7.  “IAI” shall mean the International Association for
Identification; and
8.  “Supplemental forensic standards” shall mean additional
requirements specifically related to maintenance and analysis of
forensic evidence required in addition to the calibration and
testing requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 standards.
B.  Effective July 1, 2005, all forensic laboratories as defined
in this act established or operating prior to that date shall be
accredited.  The following exceptions shall apply:
1.  Breath testing for alcohol;
2.  Field testing, crime scene processing, crime scene evidence
collection, searches, examinations or enhancements of digital
evidence, and crime scene reconstruction;
3.  Latent print identification performed by an IAI certified
latent print examiner;
4.  Marihuana identification using methods generally accepted in
the forensic field that are approved by a forensic laboratory
accredited in controlled substances;
5.  All forensic laboratories established on or after July 1,
2005, as defined in this act, shall be accredited within two (2)
years of establishment; and
6.  Forensic laboratories that exclusively and solely perform
forensic toxicology analysis may meet this requirement by being
either accredited through an accrediting body as defined in this
section or accredited by ABFT.
C.  On or after July 1, 2005, testimony, results, reports, or
evidence of forensics analysis produced on behalf of the prosecution
in a criminal trial shall be done by an accredited forensic
laboratory.  This section shall not apply to:
1.  Testimony, results, reports, or evidence of forensic
analysis produced by a forensic laboratory established after July 1,
2005, and not yet required to be accredited as set forth in
subsection B of this section;
2.  Testimony, results, reports, or evidence of forensic
analysis produced by a forensic laboratory prior to July 1, 2005.
Such testimony, results, reports, or evidence need not be performed
by an accredited forensic laboratory and may be produced or
presented on behalf of the prosecution in a criminal trial after
July 1, 2005, as long as the forensic analysis was produced prior to
that date;

3.  Testimony, results, reports, or evidence of breath testing
for alcohol;
4.  Testimony, results, reports, or evidence of field testing,
crime scene processing, crime scene evidence collection, searches,
examinations or enhancements of digital evidence, and crime scene
reconstruction;
5.  Testimony, results, reports, or evidence of latent print
identification performed by an IAI certified latent print examiner;
and
6.  Testimony, results, reports, or evidence of marihuana
identification using methods generally accepted in the forensic
field that are approved by a forensic laboratory accredited in
controlled substances.
Added by Laws 2002, c. 351, § 3, emerg. eff. May 30, 2002.  Amended
by Laws 2003, c. 203, § 1, emerg. eff. May 9, 2003; Laws 2011, c.
137, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 2011.

‹ Prev All Oklahoma sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.