Oklahoma Code § 63-2-432

Title 63. Public Health And Safety: Attachments of assets - Execution of judgment - Exempt
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
property - Property seized by forfeiture.
A.  A plaintiff under the Drug Dealer Liability Act, subject to
subsection C of this section, may request an ex parte prejudgment
attachment order from the court against all assets of a defendant
sufficient to satisfy a potential award.  If attachment is
instituted, a defendant is entitled to an immediate hearing.
Attachment may be lifted if the defendant demonstrates that the
assets will be available for a potential award of if the defendant
posts a bond sufficient to cover a potential award.
B.  A person against whom a judgment has been rendered under the
Drug Dealer Liability Act is not eligible to exempt any property, of
whatever kind, from process to levy or process to execute on the
judgment.

C.  Any assets sought to satisfy a judgment under the Drug
Dealer Liability Act that are named in a forfeiture section or have
been seized for forfeiture by any state or federal agency may not be
used to satisfy a judgment unless and until the assets have been
released following the conclusion of the forfeiture action or
released by the agency that seized the assets.

‹ Prev All Oklahoma sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.