Oklahoma Code § 44-869

Title 44. Militia: Review by State Judge Advocate
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
ARTICLE 69.  Review by State Judge Advocate.
A.  In general.  Upon application by the accused and subject to
subsections B, C and D of this section, the State Judge Advocate may
modify or set aside, in whole or in part, the findings and sentence
in a court-martial that is not reviewed under Section 866 of this
title (Article 66).
B.  Timing.  To qualify for consideration, an application under
subsection A of this section shall be submitted to the State Judge
Advocate not later than one (1) year after the date of completion of
review under Section 864 or 865 of this title (Article 64 or 65), as
the case may be.  The State Judge Advocate may, for good cause
shown, extend the period for submission of an application, but may
not consider an application submitted more than three (3) years
after such completion date.
C.  Scope.
1. a. In a case reviewed under Section 864 or subsection B
of Section 865 of this title (Article 64 or Article
65, subsection B), the State Judge Advocate may set
aside the findings or sentence, in whole or in part,
on the grounds of newly discovered evidence, fraud on
the court, lack of jurisdiction over the accused or
the offense, error prejudicial to the substantial
rights of the accused, or the appropriateness of the
sentence.
b. In setting aside findings or sentence, the State Judge
Advocate may order a rehearing, except that a
rehearing may not be ordered in violation of Section
844 of this title (Article 44).
c. If the State Judge Advocate sets aside findings and
sentence and does not order a rehearing, the State
Judge Advocate shall dismiss the charges.
d. If the State Judge Advocate sets aside findings and
orders a rehearing and the convening authority

determines that a rehearing would be impractical, the
convening authority shall dismiss the charges.
2.  In a case reviewed under subsection B of Section 865 of this
title (Article 65, subsection B), review under this section is
limited to the issue of whether the waiver or withdrawal of an
appeal was invalid under the law.  If the State Judge Advocate
determines that the waiver or withdrawal of an appeal was invalid,
the State Judge Advocate shall order appropriate corrective action
under regulations promulgated by the Adjutant General.
D.  Military Court of Appeals.
1.  The Military Court of Appeals may review the action taken by
the State Judge Advocate under subsection C of this section:
a. in a case sent to the Military Court of Appeals by
order of the State Judge Advocate, or
b. in a case submitted to the Military Court of Appeals
by the accused in an application for review.
2.  The Military Court of Appeals may grant an application under
subparagraph b of paragraph 1 of this subsection only if:
a. the application demonstrates a substantial basis for
concluding that the action on review under subsection
C of this section constituted prejudicial error, and
b. the application is filed not later than the earlier
of:
(1) sixty (60) days after the date on which the
accused is notified of the decision of the State
Judge Advocate, or
(2) sixty (60) days after the date on which a copy of
the decision of the State Judge Advocate is
deposited in the United States mail for delivery
by first-class certified mail to the accused at
an address provided by the accused or, if no such
address has been provided by the accused, at the
latest address listed for the accused in his or
her official service record.
3.  The submission of an application for review under this
subsection does not constitute a proceeding before the Military
Court of Appeals for purposes of paragraph 1 of subsection C of
Section 870 of this title (Article 70, subsection C, paragraph 1).
E.  Action only on matters of law.  Notwithstanding Section 866
of this title (Article 66), in any case reviewed by the Military
Court of Appeals under subsection D of this section, the Court may
take action only with respect to matters of law.

‹ Prev All Oklahoma sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.