Oklahoma Code § 43-112.3

Title 43. Marriage And Family: Notice of proposed relocation or change of residence
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
A.  As used in this section:
1.  “Change of residence address” means a change in the primary
residence of an adult;
2.  “Child” means a child under the age of eighteen (18) who has
not been judicially emancipated;
3.  “Person entitled to custody of or visitation with a child”
means a person so entitled by virtue of a court order or by an
express agreement that is subject to court enforcement;
4.  “Principal residence of a child” means:
a. the location designated by a court to be the primary
residence of the child,
b. in the absence of a court order, the location at which
the parties have expressly agreed that the child will
primarily reside, or
c. in the absence of a court order or an express
agreement, the location, if any, at which the child,

preceding the time involved, lived with the child’s
parents, a parent, or a person acting as parent for at
least six (6) consecutive months and, in the case of a
child less than six (6) months old, the location at
which the child lived from birth with any of the
persons mentioned.  Periods of temporary absence of
any of the named persons are counted as part of the
six-month or other period; and
5.  “Relocation” means a change in the principal residence of a
child over seventy-five (75) miles from the child's principal
residence for a period of sixty (60) days or more, but does not
include a temporary absence from the principal residence.
B.  1.  Except as otherwise provided by this section, a person
who has the right to establish the principal residence of the child
shall notify every other person entitled to visitation with the
child of a proposed relocation of the child’s principal residence as
required by this section.
2.  Except as otherwise provided by this section, an adult
entitled to visitation with a child shall notify every other person
entitled to custody of or visitation with the child of an intended
change in the primary residence address of the adult as required by
this section.
C.  1.  Except as provided by this section, notice of a proposed
relocation of the principal residence of a child or notice of an
intended change of the primary residence address of an adult must be
given:
a. by mail to the last-known address of the person to be
notified, and
b. no later than:
(1) the sixtieth day before the date of the intended
move or proposed relocation, or
(2)  the tenth day after the date that the person
knows the information required to be furnished
pursuant to this subsection, if the person did
not know and could not reasonably have known the
information in sufficient time to comply with the
sixty-day notice, and it is not reasonably
possible to extend the time for relocation of the
child.
2.  Except as provided by this section, the following
information, if available, must be included with the notice of
intended relocation of the child or change of primary residence of
an adult:
a. the intended new residence, including the specific
address, if known,
b. the mailing address, if not the same,
c. the home telephone number, if known,

d. the date of the intended move or proposed relocation,
e. a brief statement of the specific reasons for the
proposed relocation of a child, if applicable,
f. a proposal for a revised schedule of visitation with
the child, if any, and
g. a warning to the nonrelocating parent that an
objection to the relocation must be made within thirty
(30) days or the relocation will be permitted.
3.  A person required to give notice of a proposed relocation or
change of residence address under this subsection has a continuing
duty to provide a change in or addition to the information required
by this subsection as that information becomes known.
D.  After the effective date of this act, an order issued by a
court directed to a person entitled to custody of or visitation with
a child shall include the following or substantially similar terms:
“You, as a party in this action, are ordered to notify every
other party to this action in writing of a proposed relocation of
the child, change of your primary residence address, and the
following information:
1.  The intended new residence, including the specific address,
if known;
2.  The mailing address, if not the same;
3.  The home telephone number, if known;
4.  The date of the intended move or proposed relocation;
5.  A brief statement of the specific reasons for the proposed
relocation of a child, if applicable; and
6.  A proposal for a revised schedule of visitation with the
child, if any.
You are further ordered to give written notice of the proposed
relocation or change of residence address on or before the sixtieth
day before a proposed change.  If you do not know and could not have
reasonably known of the change in sufficient time to provide a
sixty-day notice, you are ordered to give written notice of the
change on or before the tenth day after the date that you know of
the change.
Your obligation to furnish this information to every other party
continues as long as you, or any other person, by virtue of this
order, are entitled to custody of or visitation with a child covered
by this order.
Your failure to obey the order of this court to provide every
other party with notice of information regarding the proposed
relocation or change of residence address may result in further
litigation to enforce the order, including contempt of court.
In addition, your failure to notify of a relocation of the child
may be taken into account in a modification of custody of,
visitation with, possession of or access to the child.  Reasonable

costs and attorney fees also may be assessed against you if you fail
to give the required notice.
If you, as the nonrelocating parent, do not file a proceeding
seeking a temporary or permanent order to prevent the relocation
within thirty (30) days after receipt of notice of the intent of the
other party to relocate the residence of the child, relocation is
authorized.”
E.  1.  On a finding by the court that the health, safety, or
liberty of a person or a child would be unreasonably put at risk by
the disclosure of the required identifying information in
conjunction with a proposed relocation of the child or change of
residence of an adult, the court may order that:
a. the specific residence address and telephone number of
the child or of the adult and other identifying
information shall not be disclosed in the pleadings,
other documents filed in the proceeding, or the final
order, except for an in camera disclosure,
b. the notice requirements provided by this article be
waived to the extent necessary to protect
confidentiality and the health, safety or liberty of a
person or child, and
c. any other remedial action that the court considers
necessary to facilitate the legitimate needs of the
parties and the best interest of the child.
2.  If appropriate, the court may conduct an ex parte hearing
pursuant to this subsection.
F.  1.  The court may consider a failure to provide notice of a
proposed relocation of a child as provided by this section as:
a. a factor in making its determination regarding the
relocation of a child,
b. a factor in determining whether custody or visitation
should be modified,
c. a basis for ordering the return of the child if the
relocation has taken place without notice, and
d. sufficient cause to order the person seeking to
relocate the child to pay reasonable expenses and
attorney fees incurred by the person objecting to the
relocation.
2.  In addition to the sanctions provided by this subsection,
the court may make a finding of contempt if a party violates the
notice requirement required by this section and may impose the
sanctions authorized for contempt of a court order.
G.  1.  The person entitled to custody of a child may relocate
the principal residence of a child after providing notice as
provided by this section unless a parent entitled to notice files a
proceeding seeking a temporary or permanent order to prevent the
relocation within thirty (30) days after receipt of the notice.

2.  A parent entitled by court order or written agreement to
visitation with a child may file a proceeding objecting to a
proposed relocation of the principal residence of a child and seek a
temporary or permanent order to prevent the relocation.
3.  If relocation of the child is proposed, a nonparent entitled
by court order or written agreement to visitation with a child may
file a proceeding to obtain a revised schedule of visitation, but
may not object to the proposed relocation or seek a temporary or
permanent order to prevent the relocation.
4.  A proceeding filed pursuant to this subsection must be filed
within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice of a proposed
relocation.
H.  1.  The court may grant a temporary order restraining the
relocation of a child, or ordering return of the child if a
relocation has previously taken place, if the court finds:
a. the required notice of a proposed relocation of a
child as provided by this section was not provided in
a timely manner and the parties have not presented an
agreed-upon revised schedule for visitation with the
child for the court’s approval,
b. the child already has been relocated without notice,
agreement of the parties, or court approval, or
c. from an examination of the evidence presented at the
temporary hearing there is a likelihood that on final
hearing the court will not approve the relocation of
the primary residence of the child.
2.  The court may grant a temporary order permitting the
relocation of the child pending final hearing if the court:
a. finds that the required notice of a proposed
relocation of a child as provided by this section was
provided in a timely manner and issues an order for a
revised schedule for temporary visitation with the
child, and
b. finds from an examination of the evidence presented at
the temporary hearing there is a likelihood that on
final hearing the court will approve the relocation of
the primary residence of the child.
I.  A proposed relocation of a child may be a factor in
considering a change of custody.
J.  1.  In reaching its decision regarding a proposed
relocation, the court shall consider the following factors:
a. the nature, quality, extent of involvement, and
duration of the child’s relationship with the person
proposing to relocate and with the nonrelocating
person, siblings, and other significant persons in the
child’s life,

b. the age, developmental stage, needs of the child, and
the likely impact the relocation will have on the
child’s physical, educational, and emotional
development, taking into consideration any special
needs of the child,
c. the feasibility of preserving the relationship between
the nonrelocating person and the child through
suitable visitation arrangements, considering the
logistics and financial circumstances of the parties,
d. the child’s preference, taking into consideration the
age and maturity of the child,
e. whether there is an established pattern of conduct of
the person seeking the relocation, either to promote
or thwart the relationship of the child and the
nonrelocating person,
f. whether the relocation of the child will enhance the
general quality of life for both the custodial party
seeking the relocation and the child, including but
not limited to financial or emotional benefit or
educational opportunity,
g. the reasons of each person for seeking or opposing the
relocation, and
h. any other factor affecting the best interest of the
child.
2.  The court may not:
a. give undue weight to the temporary relocation as a
factor in reaching its final decision, if the court
has issued a temporary order authorizing a party
seeking to relocate a child to move before final
judgment is issued, or
b. consider whether the person seeking relocation of the
child has declared that he or she will not relocate if
relocation of the child is denied.
K.  The relocating person has the burden of proof that the
proposed relocation is made in good faith.  If that burden of proof
is met, the burden shifts to the nonrelocating person to show that
the proposed relocation is not in the best interest of the child.
L.  1.  After notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond,
the court may impose a sanction on a person proposing a relocation
of the child or objecting to a proposed relocation of a child if it
determines that the proposal was made or the objection was filed:
a. to harass a person or to cause unnecessary delay or
needless increase in the cost of litigation,
b. without being warranted by existing law or was based
on frivolous argument, or
c. based on allegations and other factual contentions
which had no evidentiary support or, if specifically

so identified, could not have been reasonably believed
to be likely to have evidentiary support after further
investigation.
2.  A sanction imposed under this subsection shall be limited to
what is sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct or comparable
conduct by others similarly situated.  The sanction may include
directives of a nonmonetary nature, an order to pay a penalty into
court, or, if imposed on motion and warranted for effective
deterrence, an order directing payment to the other party of some or
all of the reasonable attorney fees and other expenses incurred as a
direct result of the violation.
M.  If the issue of relocation is presented at the initial
hearing to determine custody of and visitation with a child, the
court shall apply the factors set forth in this section in making
its initial determination.
N.  1.  The provisions of this section apply to an order
regarding custody of or visitation with a child issued:
a. after the effective date of this act, and
b. before the effective date of this act, if the existing
custody order or enforceable agreement does not
expressly govern the relocation of the child or there
is a change in the primary residence address of an
adult affected by the order.
2.  To the extent that a provision of this section conflicts
with an existing custody order or enforceable agreement, this
section does not apply to the terms of that order or agreement that
govern relocation of the child or a change in the primary residence
address of an adult.

‹ Prev All Oklahoma sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.