*Section 9--406. Discharge of Account Debtor; Notification of\n Assignment; Identification and Proof of Assignment;\n Restrictions on Assignment of Accounts, Chattel Paper,\n Payment Intangibles, and Promissory Notes Ineffective.\n (a) Discharge of account debtor; effect of notification. Subject to\nsubsections (b) through (h), an account debtor on an account, chattel\npaper, or a payment intangible may discharge its obligation by paying\nthe assignor until, but not after, the account debtor receives a\nnotification, authenticated by the assignor or the assignee, that the\namount due or to become due has been assigned and that payment is to be\nmade to the assignee. After receipt of the notification, the account\ndebtor may discharge its obligation by paying the assignee and may not\ndischarge the obligation by paying the assignor.\n (b) When notification ineffective. Subject to subsection (g),\nnotification is ineffective under subsection (a):\n (1) if it does not reasonably identify the rights assigned;\n (2) to the extent that an agreement between an account debtor and\n a seller of a payment intangible limits the account debtor's\n duty to pay a person other than the seller and the limitation\n is effective under law other than this article; or\n (3) at the option of an account debtor, if the notification\n notifies the account debtor to make less than the full amount\n of any installment or other periodic payment to the assignee,\n even if:\n (A) only a portion of the account, chattel paper, or payment\n intangible has been assigned to that assignee;\n (B) a portion has been assigned to another assignee; or\n (C) the account debtor knows that the assignment to that\n assignee is limited.\n (c) Proof of assignment. Subject to subsection (g), if requested by\nthe account debtor, an assignee shall seasonably furnish reasonable\nproof that the assignment has been made. Unless the assignee complies,\nthe account debtor may discharge its obligation by paying the assignor,\neven if the account debtor has received a notification under subsection\n(a).\n (d) Term restricting assignment generally ineffective. Except as\notherwise provided in subsection (e) and Sections 2-A-303 and 9--407,\nand subject to subsection (g), a term in an agreement between an account\ndebtor and an assignor or in a promissory note is ineffective to the\nextent that it:\n (1) prohibits, restricts, or requires the consent of the account\n debtor or person obligated on the promissory note to the\n assignment or transfer of, or the creation, attachment,\n perfection, or enforcement of a security interest in, the\n account, chattel paper, payment intangible, or promissory\n note; or\n (2) provides that the assignment or transfer or the creation,\n attachment, perfection, or enforcement of the security\n interest may give rise to a default, breach, right of\n recoupment, claim, defense, termination, right of\n termination, or remedy under the account, chattel paper,\n payment intangible, or promissory note.\n (e) Inapplicability of subsection (d) to certain sales. Subsection (d)\ndoes not apply to the sale of a payment intangible or promissory note.\n (f) Subsection (b)(3) not waivable. Subject to subsection (g), an\naccount debtor may not waive or vary its option under subsection (b)(3).\n (g) Rule for individual under other law. This section is subject to a\nrule of law, statute, rule or regulation other than this article which\nestablishes a different rule for an account debtor who is an individual\nand who incurred the obligation primarily for personal, family, or\nhousehold purposes.\n (h) Inapplicability. This section does not apply to:\n (1) an a
‹ Prev All New York sections Next ›
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.