A. The state engineer shall approve the application if the applicant has reasonably shown that his proposed use and location of use is a beneficial use and: (1) will not impair any existing right to a greater degree than such right is, or would be, impaired by the continued use and location of use by the owner; and (2) will not be contrary to the conservation of water within the state or detrimental to the public welfare of the state. B. In the case of annual allotments of project water leased to a special water users' association from an irrigation district organized pursuant to Chapter 73, Article 10 NMSA 1978, if the state engineer determines that the proposed changes in place and purpose of use and point of diversion comply with the rules established pursuant to Subsection G of Section 73-10-48 NMSA 1978, the board of directors of the irrigation district may approve the application in accordance with the provisions of Section 73-10-48 NMSA 1978. History: 1953 Comp., § 75-40-5, enacted by Laws 1967, ch. 100, § 5; 1999, ch. 40, § 2; 2003, ch. 369, § 3. Cross references. — For the state engineer, see 72-2-1 NMSA 1978. The 2003 amendment, effective July 1, 2003, inserted the designations in Subsection A and added Subsection B. The 1999 amendment, effective June 18, 1999, inserted "state" in the introductory language, added the Subsection A designation, and added Subsection B. State engineer is without statutory or regulatory authority to issue preliminary approvals of proposed leases of water rights. — The legislature has provided standards that the state engineer must follow when considering the approval of proposed leases of water rights and has provided a step by step process of the administrative procedures that a lease application is subject to, including the incorporation of procedural requirements to add public notice and specific timelines to the state engineer's review of these applications, and therefore where the state engineer has approved temporary changes in water use leases on a "preliminary" basis prior to or without a hearing, this practice is without statutory authority. Moreover, state engineer regulations explicitly prohibit changes to point of diversion, place of use, or purpose of use prior to use by a lessee without the opportunity for objections to be considered in a hearing first. The law does not allow for the state engineer to circumvent procedures and protections clearly defined in statute, even if temporary in nature. 2023 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 23-01. Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — 2 Am. Jur. 2d Administrative Law § 261 et seq. 93 C.J.S. Waters § 180.
‹ Prev All New Mexico sections Next ›
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.