Nevada Code § 387.121

Intent of Legislature to provide additional resources to Pupil-Centered Funding Plan to meet needs of certain categories of pupils and promote transparency and accountability in public education
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
1. The Legislature declares that the
proper objective of state financial aid to public education is to ensure each
Nevada child a reasonably equal educational opportunity. Recognizing wide local
variations in wealth and costs per pupil, this State should supplement local
financial ability to whatever extent necessary in each school district to
provide programs of instruction in both compulsory and elective subjects that
offer full opportunity for every Nevada child to receive the benefit of the
purposes for which public schools are maintained. Therefore, the quintessence
of the States financial obligation for such programs can be expressed by
combining money raised pursuant to state law at the local level with state
money to provide a certain basic level of support to each pupil in this State,
adjusted to account for variation in the local costs to provide a reasonably
equal educational opportunity to pupils and for the costs of providing a
reasonably equal educational opportunity to pupils with certain additional
educational needs. This formula is designated the Pupil-Centered Funding Plan.
2. It is the intent of the Legislature,
commencing with Fiscal Year 2019-2020, to promote transparency and
accountability in state funding for public education by accounting for all
state financial aid to public schools and projected local financial aid to
public schools, both on a per pupil basis and on a per program basis, and
expressing the total per pupil amount of all such support.
3. It is the intent of the Legislature to
accomplish the transition to the Pupil-Centered Funding Plan without causing an
unexpected loss of revenue to any school district, charter school or university
school for profoundly gifted pupils which may receive less money on a per-pupil
basis under the Pupil-Centered Funding Plan than the district, charter school
or university school for profoundly gifted pupils received during the fiscal
year ending on June 30, 2020. Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, if
a school district, charter school or university school for profoundly gifted
pupils would receive less money under the Pupil-Centered Funding Plan than the
district, charter school or university school for profoundly gifted pupils
received during the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2020, it is the intent of
the Legislature that the school district, charter school or university school
for profoundly gifted pupils instead receive a reasonably similar level of
funding on a per-pupil basis that the district, charter school or university
school for profoundly gifted pupils received during the fiscal year ending on
June 30, 2020, and be given the flexibility to reapportion money between its
adjusted base per pupil funding and weighted funding in a manner similar to the
apportionment of such money in the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2020, to
ensure that each pupil in the district, charter school or university school for
profoundly gifted pupils receives a reasonably equal educational opportunity.
When determining whether charter schools should receive a reasonably similar
level of funding on a per-pupil basis that charter schools received during the
fiscal year ending on June 30, 2020, it is the intent of the Legislature that
all charter schools should be considered as a whole rather than evaluated
individually.
4. It is the intent of the Legislature to
ensure that no school district that receives a modified allocation of money as
described in subsection 3 receives less funding in a school year than the
school district received in the immediately preceding school year unless the
enrollment in the school district continues to decline for a period of 2 years
or more. In the event of such an enrollment decline, it is the intent of the
Legislature to determine an appropriate method to mitigate the effects of a
continued decline in enrollment, which may include, without limitation,
appropriating money to the school district as if the number of pupils enrolled
in the district equaled the average number of pupils enrolled in the district
over a rolling 3-year period.

‹ Prev All Nevada sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.