Nevada Code § 133.170

Omission of child or grandchild presumed intentional; rights of child or grandchild if omission found unintentional
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
When
the child of a testator or the issue of a deceased child of a testator is
omitted from the testators will, it must be presumed that the omission was
intentional. Should the court find that the omission was unintentional, the
child, or the issue of the deceased child, is entitled to the same share in the
estate of the testator as if the testator had died intestate.

‹ Prev All Nevada sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.