Nevada Code § 130.205

Continuing, exclusive jurisdiction of tribunal that has issued child-support order; becoming initiating tribunal to request modification of child-support order
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
1. A tribunal of this State that has
issued a child-support order consistent with the law of this State has and
shall exercise continuing and exclusive jurisdiction to modify its
child-support order if the order is the controlling order and:
(a) At the time of the filing of a request for
modification, this State is the residence of the obligor, the obligee who is a
natural person or the child for whose benefit the support order is issued; or
(b) Even if this State is not the residence of
the obligor, the obligee who is a natural person or the child for whose benefit
the support order is issued, the parties consent in a record or in open court
that the tribunal of this State may continue to exercise jurisdiction to modify
its order.
2. A tribunal of this State that has
issued a child-support order consistent with the law of this State may not
exercise continuing and exclusive jurisdiction to modify its child-support
order if:
(a) All of the parties who are natural persons
file consent in a record with the tribunal of this State that a tribunal of
another state that has jurisdiction over at least one of the parties who is a
natural person or that is located in the state of residence of the child may
modify the order and assume continuing and exclusive jurisdiction; or
(b) Its order is not the controlling order.
3. If a tribunal of another state has
issued a child-support order pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support
Act or a law substantially similar to that Act which modifies a child-support
order of a tribunal of this State, tribunals of this State shall recognize the
continuing and exclusive jurisdiction of the tribunal of the other state.
4. A tribunal of this State that lacks
continuing and exclusive jurisdiction to modify a child-support order may serve
as an initiating tribunal to request a tribunal of another state to modify a
support order issued in that state.
5. A temporary support order issued ex
parte or pending resolution of a jurisdictional conflict does not create
continuing and exclusive jurisdiction in the issuing tribunal.

‹ Prev All Nevada sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.