The following rules govern priority among conflicting security interests in the same investment property: 1. A security interest held by a secured party having control of investment property under NRS 104.9106 has priority over a security interest held by a secured party that does not have control of the investment property. 2. A security interest in a certificated security in registered form which is perfected by taking delivery under subsection 1 of NRS 104.9313 and not by control under NRS 104.9314 has priority over a conflicting security interest perfected by a method other than control. 3. Except as otherwise provided in subsections 4 and 5, conflicting security interests held by secured parties each of which has control under NRS 104.9106 rank according to priority in time of: (a) If the collateral is a security, obtaining control; (b) If the collateral is a security entitlement carried in a securities account: (1) The secured partys becoming the person for which the securities account is maintained, if the secured party obtained control under paragraph (a) of subsection 4 of NRS 104.8106 ; (2) The securities intermediarys agreement to comply with the secured partys entitlement orders with respect to security entitlements carried or to be carried in the securities account, if the secured party obtained control under paragraph (b) of that subsection; or (3) If the secured party obtained control through another person under paragraph (c) of that subsection, the time on which priority would be based under this paragraph if the other person were the secured party; or (c) If the collateral is a commodity contract carried with a commodity intermediary, the satisfaction of the requirement for control specified in paragraph (b) of subsection 2 of NRS 104.9106 with respect to commodity contracts carried or to be carried with the commodity intermediary. 4. A security interest held by a securities intermediary in a security entitlement or a securities account maintained with the securities intermediary has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party. 5. A security interest held by a commodity intermediary in a commodity contract or a commodity account maintained with the commodity intermediary has priority over a conflicting security interest held by another secured party. 6. Conflicting security interests granted by a broker, securities intermediary or commodity intermediary which are perfected without control under NRS 104.9106 rank equally. 7. In all other cases, priority among conflicting security interests in investment property is governed by NRS 104.9322 and 104.9323 .
‹ Prev All Nevada sections Next ›
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.