Nevada Code § 1.4653

Circumstances under which judge may be disciplined or retired; forfeiture of office by justice of the peace or municipal judge for failure to attend required instruction
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
1. The Commission may remove a judge,
publicly censure a judge or impose other forms of discipline on a judge if the
Commission determines that the judge:
(a) Has committed willful misconduct;
(b) Has willfully or persistently failed to
perform the duties of office; or
(c) Is habitually intemperate.
2. The Commission may publicly censure a
judge or impose other forms of discipline on a judge if the Commission
determines that the judge has violated one or more of the provisions of the
Revised Nevada Code of Judicial Conduct in a manner that is not knowing or
deliberate.
3. The Commission may retire a judge if
the Commission determines that:
(a) The advanced age of the judge interferes with
the proper performance of judicial duties; or
(b) The judge suffers from a mental or physical
disability that prevents the proper performance of judicial duties and is
likely to be permanent in nature.
4. The Commission may order a justice of
the peace or a municipal judge to forfeit his or her office if he or she fails
to attend the instruction required pursuant to NRS 4.036 or 5.026 , as applicable, unless the Commission
finds that there was a reasonable excuse for the failure to attend the
instruction.
5. As used in this section:
(a) Habitually intemperate means the chronic,
excessive use of alcohol or another substance that affects mental processes,
awareness or judgment.
(b) Willful misconduct includes:
(1) Conviction of any crime involving moral
turpitude;
(2) A knowing or deliberate violation of
one or more of the provisions of the Revised Nevada Code of Judicial Conduct;
and
(3) A knowing or deliberate act or
omission in the performance of judicial or administrative duties that:
(I) Involves fraud or bad faith or
amounts to a public offense; and
(II) Tends to corrupt or impair the
administration of justice in a judicial proceeding.
The term
does not include claims of error or abuse of discretion in findings of fact,
legal decisions or procedural rulings unless supported by evidence of abuse of
authority, a disregard for fundamental rights, an intentional disregard of the
law, a pattern of legal error or an action taken for a purpose other than the
faithful discharge of judicial duty.

‹ Prev All Nevada sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.