Maryland Code § CP-10-306

Section CP-10-306
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(a) A person authorized to access a shielded record under § 10-302(b) of this
subtitle may not disclose any information from a shielded record to a person who is
not authorized to access shielded records under § 10-302(b) of this subtitle.
(b) (1) Except as provided in § 10-302(b) of this subtitle, an employer
may not:
(i) require a person who applies for employment to disclose
shielded information about criminal charges in an application, an interview, or
otherwise; or
(ii) discharge or refuse to hire a person solely because the
person refused to disclose information about criminal charges that have been
shielded.
(2) An educational institution may not:
(i) require a person who applies for admission to the
institution to disclose shielded information about criminal charges in an application,
an interview, or otherwise; or
(ii) expel or refuse to admit a person solely because the person
refused to disclose information about criminal charges that have been shielded.
(3) Except as provided in § 10-302(b) of this subtitle, a unit, an
official, or an employee of the State or a political subdivision of the State may not:
(i) require a person who applies for a permit, registration, or
government service to disclose shielded information about criminal charges in an
application, an interview, or otherwise; or

(ii) deny a person's application for a permit, registration, or
government service solely because the person refused to disclose information about
criminal charges that have been shielded.
§10-401. IN EFFECT
The Maryland Judiciary Case Search may not in any way refer to the existence
of records of a charge in a case with electronic records if the charge resulted in:
(1) acquittal;
(2) dismissal; or
(3) nolle prosequi, except nolle prosequi with the requirement of drug
or alcohol treatment.
§10-401. ** TAKES EFFECT JANUARY 31, 2026 PER CHAPTER 95 OF 2025 **
(a) The Maryland Judiciary Case Search may not in any way refer to the
existence of records of a charge in a case with electronic records if the charge resulted
in:
(1) acquittal;
(2) dismissal;
(3) nolle prosequi; or
(4) the court marking the charge stet on the docket at least 3 years
previously.
(b) The Maryland Judiciary Case Search may not in any way refer to the
existence of records of a charge of possession of cannabis in a case with electronic
records if the charge resulted in a conviction that was later pardoned by the Governor.

‹ Prev All Maryland sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.