Colorado Code § 29-35-201

Legislative declaration
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this section
(1) The general assembly hereby finds, determines,
and declares that:
(a) Multifamily housing is typically more affordable than single-unit dwellings.
According to the American Community Survey, Colorado multifamily units cost between
fourteen and forty-three percent less to rent in 2019, depending on the size of the building,
compared to single-unit detached dwellings.
(b) Allowing higher density residential development is important for the cost
effectiveness and availability of affordable housing. An analysis of over sixty affordable housing
projects funded by the U.S. department of housing and urban development in transit-oriented
areas in Colorado since 2010 found that half were developed at over fifty units per acre, and
twenty percent were over one hundred units per acre.
(c) Throughout Colorado, less than half of available zoning capacity is typically utilized,
and greater utilization of zoning capacity is necessary to meet anticipated housing needs.
Numerous factors currently prevent development from fully utilizing available zoning capacity
and allowed densities, including site level constraints, financial feasibility and demand, and
landowners' willingness to sell or redevelop.
(d) Colorado has invested significantly in public transit in the last several decades,
funding over six billion dollars across eighty-five miles of new rail lines. The investments will
continue in the coming years with new bus rapid transit and rail systems along the front range.
Despite these investments, transit ridership lags behind peer agencies around the country, due at
least in part to a lack of density near these transit lines. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the
regional transportation district had two and three-tenths rides per vehicle revenue mile on their
rail system, compared to over four rides per vehicle revenue mile for agencies in Minneapolis
and Portland and over eight rides per vehicle revenue mile in Seattle, according to data from the
federal transit administration's national transit database.
(e) Allowing higher density residential development near transit is important for
increasing transit ridership and improving the cost effectiveness of transit services. Researchers
have found that higher built gross densities citywide increase cost-effectiveness for light rail and
bus rapid transit services, as described in the article, "Cost of a Ride: The Effects of Densities on
Fixed-Guideway Transit Ridership and Costs" by Erick Guerra and Robert Cervero.
(f) Most light and commuter rail stations and frequent bus corridors in Colorado have
lower housing unit density than is necessary to support frequent transit. Based on 2020 census
block housing unit data, over ninety percent of rail stations and eighty-four percent of bus rapid
transit and frequent bus corridors in Colorado have less than fifteen housing units per acre on
average within walking distance. Researchers have generally found a minimum of fifteen
housing units per acre of built density is needed to support frequent transit.
(g) Living near transit, jobs, and services enables households to also save on
transportation costs by owning fewer vehicles and reducing fuel consumption. Coloradans
commute over fifty minutes to and from work on average, according to the latest American
Community Survey's five-year estimates. Analyses of transit-oriented communities have found
that residents take an average of forty-four percent fewer vehicle trips, according to the article
"Vehicle Trip Reduction Impacts of Transit-Oriented Housing" in the Journal of Public
Transportation.
(h) In Colorado, households in more dense areas, which are defined as census tracts with
more than four thousand units per square mile or about fifteen units per acre, drive twenty
percent less than the state average, and higher density areas, census tracts with more than ten
thousand units per square mile or about forty units per acre, drive forty percent less than the state
average, according to data from the 2017 national household travel survey;
(i) High transportation costs impact low-income households in particular. Households
making less than forty thousand dollars per year in the western United States are spending over
twenty-four percent of their income on transportation, when spending more than fifteen percent
of income on transportation is considered cost burdened, according to data from the bureau of
labor statistics consumer expenditure surveys.
(j) In addition to saving on transportation costs by living near transit, owning fewer
vehicles and traveling to work and accessing services without driving or driving less reduces
greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution, which impacts air quality not just in transit-oriented
communities but in greater regions across the state;
(k) In Colorado, household energy demand on average is seventy percent less for
multifamily housing compared to single-unit detached dwellings, according to the national
renewable energy laboratory restock analysis tool;
(l) Scenarios analyzed for the "Colorado Water and Growth Dialogue Final Report" with
higher percentage of future housing shifting to higher densities were estimated to achieve a total
decrease in water demand between four and eight-tenths percent and nineteen and four-tenths
percent;
(m) National studies, such as the article "Relationships between Density and per Capita
Municipal Spending in the United States", published in Urban Science, have found that lower
density communities have higher government capital and maintenance costs for water, sewer,
and transportation infrastructure and lower property and sales tax revenue. These increased costs
are often borne by both state and local governments.
(n) A study for a municipality in Colorado found that doubling the average residential
density for future growth would save thirty-one percent in capital and maintenance costs over
twenty years;
(o) According to a 2022 article titled "Does Discretion Delay Development?" in the
Journal of the American Planning Association, residential projects using administrative approval
processes are approved twenty-eight percent faster than those using discretionary approval
processes, and faster approval times reduce developer costs and therefore housing costs. Studies
have shown that homebuilders, including affordable housing developers, will avoid parcels that
need to go through a discretionary process.
(p) Community opposition to specific affordable housing developments frequently
causes delays, increases costs, reduces the number of housing units delivered, pushes siting of
affordable housing to less opportunity-rich areas, and prevents developments from occurring
altogether, according to studies such as "Democracy in Action? NIMBY as Impediment to
Equitable Affordable Housing Siting" in the journal Housing Studies;
(q) Researchers have found that upward mobility is significantly greater in more
compact development areas than in low-density areas, primarily due to better job accessibility by
multiple transportation modes, according to the study "Does Urban Sprawl Hold Down Upward
Mobility?", published in the Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning;
(r) Transit-oriented development, including connecting housing opportunities and
services with safe multimodal infrastructure and public transit, improves the accessibility of
cities for people with disabilities and those with limited mobility. People with disabilities are
more likely to live in households with zero cars, are less likely to drive, and are more likely to
rely on public transit or paratransit, according to the 2017 "National Household Travel Survey";
(s) According to the greenhouse gas pollution reduction roadmap published by the
Colorado energy office, dated January 14, 2021, the transportation sector is the single largest
source of greenhouse gas pollution in Colorado. Nearly sixty percent of the greenhouse gas
emissions from the transportation sector come from light-duty vehicles, which are the majority
of cars and trucks that Coloradans drive every day.
(t) Motor vehicle pollution, including greenhouse gas emissions, does not stay within the
geographic boundaries of the local government where it is emitted;
(u) The greenhouse gas transportation planning standard adopted by the transportation
commission of Colorado in 2021 set a statewide target to reduce transportation greenhouse gas
emissions through the transportation planning process by one million five hundred thousand tons
by 2030; and
(v) The United States environmental protection agency has classified the Denver Metro
and North Front Range area as being in severe non-attainment for ozone and ground level ozone,
which has serious impacts on human health, particularly for vulnerable populations.
(2) The general assembly further finds and declares that:
(a) The consequences of community opposition and local land use policies that limit
housing supply in transit-oriented communities impact housing options for Coloradans of low
and moderate incomes and workforce housing to support employment growth. Increasing higher-
density housing in transit-oriented communities ensures stable quantity and quality of housing
for everyone and corrects policies that perpetuate segregated and unequal communities, reduced
mobility and long commutes, reduced options for older adults to age in their community of
choice, loss of open space and agricultural land, high water usage, and increased greenhouse gas
and air pollution.
(b) There is an extraterritorial impact when local governments restrict housing
development within their jurisdictions. The call for job growth in one community that does not
also address the need for additional housing affects the demand of housing development in
neighboring jurisdictions. In Colorado, the number of jobs within large municipalities is
generally correlated to the municipality's transit service, and research has shown that regional
imbalances between jobs and housing have a significant impact on vehicle miles traveled and
commute times across jurisdictions, according to studies such as "Which Reduces Vehicle
Travel More: Jobs-Housing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing?", published in the Journal of the
American Planning Association. When people are unable to live near where they work, workers
have no options but to spend more hours on the road commuting to and from work. The longer
commute increases vehicle traffic and puts additional strain on Colorado's roads and increases
pollution.
(c) The availability of affordable housing is a matter of mixed statewide and local
concern. Therefore, it is the intent of the general assembly in enacting this part 2 to:
(I) Provide funding for infrastructure and affordable housing to support local
governments whose zoning does meet the goals of this part 2, and to encourage more dense
multifamily housing development projects that can address the state's housing shortage for all
parts of the income spectrum, and support more fiscally and environmentally sustainable
development patterns;
(II) Improve regional collaboration and outcomes by reducing the ability of individual
local governments' land use restrictions to negatively influence regional concerns such as
housing affordability, open space, traffic, and air pollution; and
(III) Colorado has a legitimate state interest in managing population and development
growth and ensuring stable quality and quantity of housing for Coloradans; and
(d) Colorado has a legitimate state interest in managing population and development
growth and ensuring stable quality and quantity of housing for Coloradans as this is among the
most pressing problems currently facing communities throughout Colorado.
(3) Therefore, the general assembly finds, determines, and declares that the lack of
housing supply and unsustainable development patterns require a statewide solution that
addresses local government policies that effectively limit the construction of a diverse range of
housing types in areas already served by infrastructure or in close proximity to jobs and public
transit, along with a lack of funding for infrastructure and affordable housing near transit-
oriented communities.
(4) Therefore, the general assembly declares that increasing housing in transit-oriented
communities is a matter of mixed statewide and local concern.

‹ Prev All Colorado sections Next ›


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.