(a) The State Board of Equalization shall continue to negotiate a settlement with the government of the United States relating to the amount and repayment of the sales tax refund liability of the state and local agencies pursuant to the court decision in Aerospace Corporation v. State Board of Equalization, 218 Cal. App. 3d 1300. To the maximum extent possible, the board shall include in the settlement agreement a provision that, upon adoption of the settlement agreement between the board and the government of the United States, the board, the government of the United States, and the aerospace contractors affected by the courtâs decision in Aerospace Corporation v. State Board of Equalization shall cease to incur any further costs associated with the audit of claims for sales tax refunds, and the repayment of the sales tax refund by local agencies shall be made on or after July 1, 1993, through deductions in sales and use tax transmittals to cities and counties pursuant to a method to be determined as specified in subdivisions (b) and (c), respectively, or pursuant to the formula determined by the board as specified in subdivision (e). (b) (1) The State Board of Equalization shall establish a Cities Task Force on Aerospace Refunds. The task force shall be appointed by the League of California Cities. The task force shall meet regularly for the purpose specified in paragraph (2). (2) The task force shall be responsible for establishing a method for the distribution of the sales tax refund liability among cities in the state arising from the court decision in Aerospace Corporation v. State Board of Equalization, 218 Cal. App. 3d 1300. (3) On or before April 1, 1993, the task force shall submit to the board its recommendation of the method for the distribution of the sales tax refund liability among cities associated with the Aerospace Corporation case. (4) The board shall adopt the recommendation of the task force and implement the method contained in the recommendation for making the deduction from city sales and use tax transmittals effective July 1, 1993. (5) If the task force fails to submit its recommendation to the board as specified in paragraph (3), the board shall implement the formula specified in subdivision (e) to govern the distribution of deductions of sales and use tax transmittals among cities effective July 1, 1993. (c) (1) The State Board of Equalization shall establish a Counties Task Force on Aerospace Refunds. The task force members shall be appointed by the California State Association of Counties. The task force shall meet regularly for the purpose specified in paragraph (2). (2) The task force shall be responsible for establishing a method for the distribution of the sales tax refund liability among counties in the state arising from the court decision in Aerospace Corporation v. State Board of Equalization, 218 Cal. App. 3d 1300. (3) On or before April 1, 1993, the task force shall submit to the board its recommendation of the method for the allocation of the sales tax refund liability among counties associated with the Aerospace Corporation case. (4) The board shall adopt the recommendation of the task force and implement the method contained in the recommendation for making the deduction from county sales and use tax transmittals effective July 1, 1993. (5) If the task force fails to submit its recommendation to the board as specified in paragraph (3), the board shall implement the formula as specified in subdivision (e) to govern the distribution of deductions of sales and use tax transmittals among counties effective July 1, 1993. (d) The deductions from the sales and use tax transmittals pursuant to the methods established pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (c) shall, in the aggregate, equal the amount of the refund required of cities and counties by the Aerospace Corporation court decision. (e) (1) If, on or before April 1, 1993, the Cities Task Force on Aerospace Refunds or the Counties Task Force
‹ Prev All California sections Next ›
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.