It is no defense to a prosecution under §§ 5-53-102 and 5-53-103 that: (1) The oath was administered or taken in an irregular manner; or (2) The person administering the oath lacked authority to administer the oath if the taking of the oath was required by law. Acts 1975, No. 280, § 2607; A.S.A. 1947, § 41-2607. It is no defense to a prosecution under §§ 5-53-102 and 5-53-103 that: (1) The oath was administered or taken in an irregular manner; or (2) The person administering the oath lacked authority to administer the oath if the taking of the oath was required by law. Acts 1975, No. 280, § 2607; A.S.A. 1947, § 41-2607. It is no defense to a prosecution under §§ 5-53-102 and 5-53-103 that: (1) The oath was administered or taken in an irregular manner; or (2) The person administering the oath lacked authority to administer the oath if the taking of the oath was required by law. Acts 1975, No. 280, § 2607; A.S.A. 1947, § 41-2607. It is no defense to a prosecution under §§ 5-53-102 and 5-53-103 that: (1) The oath was administered or taken in an irregular manner; or (2) The person administering the oath lacked authority to administer the oath if the taking of the oath was required by law. Acts 1975, No. 280, § 2607; A.S.A. 1947, § 41-2607.
‹ Prev All Arkansas sections Next ›
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.