(a) An administrative law judge may amend an investigative determination to conform with the evidence presented. (b) (1) If the alleged offender could not reasonably infer the amended investigative determination from the investigative record and information submitted by the Department of Human Services and the Department of Arkansas State Police, the administrative law judge shall, upon request, grant a continuance to the alleged offender. (2) However, an amendment of the investigative determination shall not be done after the conclusion of the hearing. Amended by Act 2015, No. 1004,§ 27, eff. 7/22/2015. Acts 2009, No. 749, § 1. (a) An administrative law judge may amend an investigative determination to conform with the evidence presented. (b) (1) If the alleged offender could not reasonably infer the amended investigative determination from the investigative record and information submitted by the Department of Human Services and the Department of Arkansas State Police, the administrative law judge shall, upon request, grant a continuance to the alleged offender. (2) However, an amendment of the investigative determination shall not be done after the conclusion of the hearing. Amended by Act 2015, No. 1004,§ 27, eff. 7/22/2015. Acts 2009, No. 749, § 1. (a) An administrative law judge may amend an investigative determination to conform with the evidence presented. (b) (1) If the alleged offender could not reasonably infer the amended investigative determination from the investigative record and information submitted by the Department of Human Services and the Department of Arkansas State Police, the administrative law judge shall, upon request, grant a continuance to the alleged offender. (2) However, an amendment of the investigative determination shall not be done after the conclusion of the hearing. Amended by Act 2015, No. 1004,§ 27, eff. 7/22/2015. Acts 2009, No. 749, § 1. (a) An administrative law judge may amend an investigative determination to conform with the evidence presented. (b) (1) If the alleged offender could not reasonably infer the amended investigative determination from the investigative record and information submitted by the Department of Human Services and the Department of Arkansas State Police, the administrative law judge shall, upon request, grant a continuance to the alleged offender. (2) However, an amendment of the investigative determination shall not be done after the conclusion of the hearing. (1) If the alleged offender could not reasonably infer the amended investigative determination from the investigative record and information submitted by the Department of Human Services and the Department of Arkansas State Police, the administrative law judge shall, upon request, grant a continuance to the alleged offender. (2) However, an amendment of the investigative determination shall not be done after the conclusion of the hearing. Acts 2009, No. 749, § 1.
‹ Prev All Arkansas sections Next ›
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Statute text is provided for general information and may not reflect the most recent amendments; verify against the official state code.