Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · Decided 2001-06-15

Cited by 103 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Opinion by Judge RONALD M. GOULD; Dissent by BETTY B. FLETCHER. RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge: This is a products liability action involving pacemakers containing the allegedly defective ENCOR Bipolar Passive Fixation Pacing Lead Model 380-854 (“854 lead”). Plaintiff-Appellant Robin Zinser (“Zinser”) filed a class action complaint alleging negligence, products liability, negligent misrepresentation, frau…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.