Zarco v. State

Decided 2006-12-21

Cited by 102 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

EVA M. GUZMAN, Justice, concurring. I concur in the result, but because I respectfully disagree with the majority’s emphasis on A.C.’s credibility, I write separately to address the egregious harm analysis. Egregious harm must be assayed “in light of the entire jury charge, the state of the evidence, including the contested issues, and weight of probative evidence, the argument of couns…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.