Young v. Commonwealth Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Decided 2000-01-20

Cited by 123 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*380 NIGRO, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent, as the record does not support that Appellants Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) and Driscoll Construction Company, Inc. complied with even the minimal mandates attendant to placement of warning signs approaching work zones. Pursuant to § 203.43(a) of the Pennsylv…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.