Per Curiam. Although our reasoning differs from that employed by the court of appeals, we agree with that court that Yee is not entitled to the extraordinary writ of procedendo. We therefore affirm. I Believing that the common pleas court had no jurisdiction in Yee’s case during the pendency of the state’s appeal, the court of appeals refused to order the common pleas court to rule o…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.