Wright v. National Surety Corp.

Decided 1952-04-28

Cited by 112 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

HAMITER, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). Under the facts and circumstances of this case plaintiff, I agree, is entitled to compensation as for total and permanent disability. But I do not agree with the holding that the defendant insurance company is liable to plaintiff for the penalties and attorney’s fees provided for in LSA-R.S. 22:658.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.