COPELAND, Justice. A single question is presented for our review: Did the Court of Appeals err in reversing Judge Peel’s order for a new trial? We hold that it did and reverse. Defendant’s counsel moved for a new trial upon the grounds that the jury manifestly disregarded the court’s instructions, that the jury awarded excessive damages under the influence of passion and prejudice, and that the evidence was…
Read the full opinion (source) ↗
Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.