Wissner v. Wissner

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1950-02-06

Cited by 281 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Mr. Justice Minton, dissenting. Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Jackson, and I are unable to agree with the majority in this case. The husband’s earnings are community property under § 161a, California Civil Code. The wife has a vested interest in one-half of such earnings. United States v. Malcolm, <a href="/opinion/101690/united-states-v-malcolm/"…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.