Winfrey v. State

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals · Decided 2010-09-22

Cited by 142 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

COCHRAN, J., concurring, in which WOMACK, JOHNSON and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined. Appellant did not object at trial to Deputy Pikett’s “dog scent line-up” testimony. Therefore, neither the court of appeals nor this Court has had an occasion to review or determine the admissibility of that evidence under either Kelly v. State 1 or Nen-no v. State. <foot…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.