Wilson Trading Corp. v. David Ferguson, Ltd.

New York Court of Appeals · Decided 1968-12-12

Cited by 100 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Chief Judge Fuld (concurring). I agree that there should be a reversal — but on the sole ground that a substantial question of fact has been raised as to whether the clause limiting the time in which to make a claim is ‘1 manifestly unreasonable ’ ’ (Uniform Commercial Code, § 1-204) as applied tó the type of defect here complained of. In this view, it is not necessary to consider the relevancy, if any, of other provi…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.