Wilmington Steel Products, Inc. v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1991-06-05

Cited by 369 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Wright, J. With the dismissal of United as a defendant, only the claims against CEI remain for resolution by this court. The only issue is whether the trial judge erred in denying Wilmington’s motions to amend its complaint prior to trial. The language of Civ. R. 15(A) *122 favors a liberal policy when the trial judge is confronted with a motion to amend…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.