Whitaker-Merrell Co. v. Carl M. Geupel Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1972-03-15

Cited by 346 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Schneider, J. Appellee Geupel was awarded a state highway construction contract and entered into a subcontract for paving with Davidson, who in turn purchased material and services from various materialmen, including Whitaker, Purdy, Basic and Standard Oil of Ohio. The latter were not paid in full by Davidson. Whitaker sued Geupel as prime contractor, and Aetna as surety on its statutory bond, pursuant to R.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.