Wheat v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1988-06-30

Cited by 1,942 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

*165 Justice Marshall, with whom Justice Brennan joins, dissenting. This Court today concludes that the District Court did not commit reversible error by denying the motion of petitioner Mark Wheat to add or substitute counsel of his choice. In the course of discussing the District Court’s ruling, the Court sets forth several principles with which I agree.…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.