Walden v. State

Supreme Court of Ohio · Decided 1989-11-29

Cited by 125 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Holmes, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur in the conclusions reached by the majority in Parts II and III of the opinion; however, I dissent as to the majority’s determination that Walden and Ellis were wrongfully imprisoned individuals pursuant to R.C. 2305.02 and 2743.48. I agree with the well-reasoned dissent of Justice Resnick, but wish to add a few comments in emphasis of such disse…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.